Mark Steyn, Creationist

Mark Steyn gets this email :


I enjoy your various articles in the Speccie, torygraph etc and agree with most of what you say and your support for Right views. But I am concerned with your right-wing mates in the US and UK who seem to be on the intelligent-design rubbish bandwagon. I hope you will distance yourself from them in future articles on this subject as there is no evidence for their views at all whereas evolution is supported by enormous volumes of evidence. You don't strike me as a creationist irrationalist.

And responds with:

The fact is that this is a planet overwhelmingly dominated and shaped by one species, and our kith and kin - whether gibbons or pumpkins - basically fit in in the spaces between. That's pretty much the world the Psalmist outlined in the Old Testament thousands of years ago. By comparison, the evolutionists' insistence that we're just another "animal" seems perverse and irrational and refuted by a casual glance out the window. I am coming round to the view that hyper-rationalism is highly irrational.

Tim Blair must reckon that Steyn is uneducated.

Update: PZ Myers writes about the hapless Steyn's ignorance of biology. Alan Adamson says that he has long enjoyed Steyn's writing but doesn't think that Steyn is worth reading any more after this.


More like this

Mark Steyn relates a story told by Johnelle Bryant: Bryant is an official with the US Department of Agriculture in Florida, and the late Atta had gone to see her about getting a $US650,000 government loan to convert a plane into the world's largest crop-duster. A novel idea. The meeting got off to…
After falling for an obvious hoax, Mark Steyn has refused to correct his error. Instead he just keeps digging himself deeper and deeper into a hole. (My previous posts on this topic:123). In his latest effort Steyn complains about how the meanies at Media Watch asked him what checks he made to…
Quoting myself: One of the less pleasant parts of my job is talking to students that I have caught plagiarizing assignments. All too often, rather than admit to copying they will tell me clumsy lies and blame somebody else. Like Mark Steyn. When he was caught stealing from a blog post by Geoff…
Some of the readers of this Mark Steyn column might have wondered why he seems oddly determined to dispute one date in the 9/11 Commission's time line: they seemed oddly determined to fix June 3, 2000, as the official date of Atta's first landing on American soil Of course, those people who heard…

The fact is that this is a planet overwhelmingly dominated and shaped by one species

I was trying to think what on earth Steyn meant by this. In terms of domination the general answer is "bacteria" and in terms of shaping the planet "plants", but it would be impossible to pick any species in particular.

I then clicked through and found Pharyngula having much the same thoughts.

I think it was the biologist JS Haldane who suggested that going by the evidence of Creation, all one could really say with any degree of conviction about God was that He liked beetles.

Reminds me of Emo Phillip's take on physiology: "I used to think the brain was the most interesting organ in the body. Then I thought 'Oh wait, look who's telling me this'".

Dsquared, I believe the quote was: "He(the Creator) seems inordinately fond of beetles."

By The Dark Avenger (not verified) on 02 Sep 2005 #permalink

Steyn is, and always has been, a complete nonentity who nitpicks others to death but cannot spot even the most glaring errors in his own arguments. Tu quoque is practically the only weapon he has ever wielded. When oh when will he go back to theatre criticism and stop making an idiot of himself.