Agricultural production and malaria resurgence

There were some letters written to Nature by malariologists disputing Chapin and Wasserstrom's paper that argued that agricultural use of DDT was the major factor in the resurgence of malaria in India and Central America. Before I write about the dispute I should stress what they all agreed on:

It is generally agreed among malariologists that agricultural
insecticides have made a contribution to selection for insecticide
resistance in mosquitoes and that such resistance has made a
contribution to the resurgence of malaria in Central America and South
Asia.

Furthermore none of the malariologists suggested that environmentalist pressure had anything to do with the resurgence of malaria. I doubt that anyone could have made such a claim in 1981 without being laughed at.

i-600b6cc747cc2f2ca0b8e45c92ca99cf-chapinreplysmall.png
Where they differ is in how important the agricultural use of DDT was in causing the resurgence. C&W had a dramatic graph showing the number of malaria cases plotted against the use of DDT. However, they were careless with the data they used with the graph, not noticing that their source (Harrison) had reported recorded cases for the start of the 70s and estimated cases at the end. This had the effect of greatly overstating the increase in malaria. A version of the graph which just shows recorded cases is shown on the left. The true number of cases is certainly much more than what is shown on the graph, but this gives a better indication of how much malaria increased. The graph still shows a strong correlation, but there are clearly other factors operating.

In the reply C&W refer to the geographic pattern of DDT resistance and increases in malaria and I think an analysis of this could give an indication of the relative importance of agricultural spraying. Unfortunately, they don't present such an analysis, so they have not proved their case.

So certainly agricultural use of DDT caused some of the increase in malaria and it may have caused a major part of the increase, but the second part is unproven.

Tags

More like this

Correspondence on the paper "Agricultural production and malaria resurgence in Central America and India"Nature Vol 294 26 November 1981 pages 302,388 Malaria debated SIR --- I have read the paper by Chapin and Wasserstrom (Nature 17 September, p.181) with interest. I am disappointed with the…
Andrew Kenny in The Spectatorwrites Judged on sheer evil, the worst crime in history was brown, the Nazi genocide, although the reds slaughtered more people. The death toll (difficult to measure) is roughly, Hitler's holocaust 6 million, Stalin's famine and terror 8 million, and Mao's famine 30…
In Yale Environment 360, Sonia Shah highlights a promising trend: communities in Mexico, China, Tanzania, and elsewhere are adopting non-chemical methods to control the populations of mosquitos that transmit malaria. They've seen their numbers of malaria cases drop, and dramatically reduced their…
Gary Becker and Richard Posner have written a pair of posts about DDT and there is much wrong with what they have written. Becker writes: The world Trade Organization (WTO) declared in 1998 a "war on malaria" that aimed to cut malaria deaths in half by 2010. Instead, deaths from malaria have been…

"agricultural use of DDT was the major factor in the resurgence of DDT "?

I think you meant "major factor in the resurgence of malaria". *[Fixed, thanks, Tim]*

By Jeffrey Shallit (not verified) on 26 Oct 2005 #permalink

Also:
"Furthermore none of the malariologists suggested that environmentalist pressure had anything to do without the resurgence of malaria"

I assume you meant "with". *[I need a "Proof Read" button as well as the "Check Spelling" one. Tim]*