Wankers

  1. T-SAW, who emailed Tim Blair:

    I saw your post about the proposed celebration at the Bellevue on Friday and your attendance along with that of some other wingnuts. Well I thought in the interests of community spirit that I'd pass along the details to some mates who used to be, amongst other things, BLF members. They were very interested in it and intend on bringing a group to join in the festivities on Friday. They mentioned something about what those blokes did to the channel 7 cameraman is gonna look like a massage when their done.

  2. Paul Deignan, who after getting banned from commenting on a blog is threatening to sue the blog owner for libel:

    Ever been sued Wally? It goes on forever and it is no fun at all (except for me). And I'm going to enjoy spending a lot of money in attorney fees because I like lawyers. Remember, if I sue you, I sue your friend. It's a twofer.

What qualifies these two as wankers is the fact that their threats are so obviously pathetically empty ones. (Deignan hasn't even hired a lawyer.)

Tags

More like this

So I was reading this thread on John Quiggin's blog when the discussion turned to Tim Blair's policy of banning any dissenters from commenting on his blog. (See here for an example of the sort of comment that will get you banned.) Now Blair doesn't have to support comments from people that…
Over the years, I've pointed out just how horrible British libel laws are. If there is a set of laws more designed to be used and abused by the wealthy to silence criticism, it's British libel laws. Indeed, I was pointing out the travesty that is British libel law in the context of David Irving's…
First, I'd like to thank you all on commenting on the weekend's de-lurking post. I really appreciate your taking the time to leave a note. While I write what I feel like, it's nice to get an idea about what sort of things people are reading. For various reasons, I've preferred to write on…
I've been criticizing the grande dame of the anti-vaccine movement, Barbara Loe Fisher, for her cowardly attempt to shut up vaccine expert Dr. Paul Offit and to intimidate journalists into not writing exposes of the anti-vaccine movement by suing Dr. Offit, Amy Wallace, and WIRED Magazine for…

Having been banned from more sites than I've had hot dinners, a tiny part of me hopes Deignam wins. Perhaps I could then sue half of 'Blogdom' and be rich. Unfortunately, I have a sinking feeling that most bloggers are not worth threepence, so there goes another sure-fire plan to retire to the Caymans. Oh well...

(sigh). You know, if you're going to call someone a wanker, you might want to at least get the factsright; otherwise, you look a like a wan...well, you know.

Read your own quote above. "Wally" isn't the owner of the site. "Wally" is the professor who emailed Deignan's Ph.D. advisors to try and screw with Deignan's career. Deignan subsequently threatened to sue the owner about comments she made that he had tried to spoof(i.e., hack) her site. None of this was about him getting banned.

Yeesh.

I didn't say that Deignan is suing for being banned -- I said that he was suing for **libel**. But, on Deignan's planet, the libellous comment was the one when she announced the ban. [Specifically](http://haloscan.com/comments/bitchphd/113089773762436266/#174980):

>I don't think Wally should contact Paul's department, I do think Paul is an ass, Paul's been banned from commenting on this forum (unless he starts spoofing ips again).

And no, she's not accusing him of hacking, just of changing IPs to avoid a ban.

This kind of thing is one of the hazards of blogging, unfortunately. From what I can see, "Wally" has behaved even worse than Deignam.

By John Quiggin (not verified) on 11 Nov 2005 #permalink