Andrew Chang writes a lettter to the Vancouver Sun which published a Lott editorial full of his usual cooked numbers.
Chang also links to an old Usenet thread where he, Mary Rosh and I were involved. Oddly enough, Lott and I have been continuing the argument in comments at the Volokh Conspiracy.
More like this
If you don't know who Mary Rosh is, you might want to read "The Mystery of Mary Rosh". Also of interest might be the blog post that unmasked Mary, and the latest Mary Rosh news.
[Editor's note: Most of these postings were made to Usenet. Some were made to comment sections on blogs, two are…
Lott has a long message at his website where he discusses Mary Rosh and argues that when he claimed that he had "not participated in the firearms discussion group nor in the apparent online newsgroup discussions", he was not lying:
Another misunderstanding in the media is that I was lying as…
I've done some more investigation in Lott's latest explanation for his Mary Rosh postings:
I originally used my own name but switched after receiving threatening and obnoxious telephone calls from other Internet posters.
The first group of Lott postings were made between 3 June…
Donald Kennedy, Editor-in-Chief of Science has an editorial (subscription required) in the April 18 edition entitled "Research Fraud and Public Policy". Here is some of it:
Michael Bellesiles, of Emory University, supported the gun control case with a book called Arming America. Part of his…
Wow. I don't know what it's going to take to make Lott go away, but he certainly isn't helping the pro-gun side of the debate.
I'm starting to think he's a plant by the gun-control crowd to make us look bad. The sheer absurdity of the situation boggles the mind.
Judging from what's going on on Wikipedia, either all those new contributors are sock pouppets and he's stuck in a do-loop, or else he's been cloned.....
z: Interned.