The Australian's War on Science 77

Michael Asten continues The Australian's war on science. In his latest piece (Google "Science hijacked at school level") Asten complains that secondary science education is not paying attention to the views of Ian Plimer on climate change.

Perusal of the resources for secondary school physics students provided by the Australian Institute of Physics (Vic) Education Committee suggests some of our science educators have indeed lost the ability to teach objective and open-minded scientific inquiry.

Web resources relating to climate science provided by this committee contain at least three teaching resource references using the derogatory term "deniers". One listed article titled "Climate deniers cause dangerous confusion" addresses claims made in a web presentation by climate science contrarian Leon Ashby and contains the telling line: "Let's look at Ashby's presentation from the point of view of science. (You don't need to have seen Ashby's presentation to follow this one. The claims he makes are typical of so called 'climate sceptics'. )"

If we ignore the multiple subheadings in the genre of "deniers", "deception", "nonsense" and "dangerous", this article contains useful if incomplete material for science teaching. But the suggestion that it is not necessary to read the source material before engaging in a critique shows a lamentable teaching methodology.

But if look at the website and the article you can see how Asten has misrepresented them.

More like this

The Australian takes another one of its shots against science with apiece by Michael Asten who claims: A recent peer-reviewed paper by Svetlana Jevrejeva from Britain's National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, provides a calculation of 0.6m-1.6m by 2100 using a range of climate models. However,…
In The Conversation Michael Ashley writes about The Australian's War on Science, with emphasis on Michael Asten's misrepresentations of the science: When I contacted The Australian's opinion editor late last year to express dismay at their bias, I was given the example of Michael Asten, a part-time…
Here is a press release that will be distributed shortly: NCSE TACKLES CLIMATE CHANGE DENIAL A new initiative in the struggle for quality science education OAKLAND, CA January 16, 2012 Science education is under attack--again. This time it's under attack by climate change deniers, who ignore a…
Last week week Senator Fielding met with the Minister for Climate Change, Penny Wong to discuss the link between global warming and greenhouse gas. While Fielding claimed to have an 'open mind', this was rather undercut by his bringing four denialists to the meeting: Bob Carter, David Evans…

It is unfair to call Plimer a denier. He’s a liar. A denier may honestly believe that a polyanna attitude to science is valid and anything else is alarmism; stupidity is after all not a crime. Plimer on the other hand has the education and knowledge to know that much of what he says is untrue. Good counters to much of his garbage here: http://www.climatechange.gov.au/climate-change/understanding-climate-ch… (linked to via the website cited in the article).

Why do these clowns think kids should be taught right-wing propaganda in schools?

By Philip Machanick (not verified) on 13 Mar 2013 #permalink