1. denialism
  2. Another loss for ID

Another loss for ID

By denialism on June 26, 2007.

The Brits have decided that Intelligent Design creationism, is well, creationism. It will not be allowed in science classes in the UK.

The government has announced that it will publish guidance for schools on how creationism and intelligent design relate to science teaching, and has reiterated that it sees no place for either on the science curriculum.

It has also defined "Intelligent Design", the idea that life is too complex to have arisen without the guiding hand of a greater intelligence, as a religion, along with "creationism".

...

The petition was posted by James Rocks of the Science, Just Science campaign, a group that formed to counter a nascent anti-evolution lobby in the UK.

He wrote: "Creationism & Intelligent design are...being used disingenuously to portray science & the theory or evolution as being in crisis when they are not... These ideas therefore do not constitute science, cannot be considered scientific education and therefore do not belong in the nation's science classrooms."

No. Can't have. Not science.

Tags
Evolution Denialism

More like this

And there shall be wailing and weeping and gnashing of teeth
The UK government does not mince words. The government has announced that it will publish guidance for schools on how creationism and intelligent design relate to science teaching, and has reiterated that it sees no place for either on the science curriculum. It has also defined "Intelligent Design…
Creationism in the UK Schools
The UK really doesn't deserve this: first, they're dragged into Iraq, and now, they're being invaded by creationists. Even though the Department for Education and Skills has called creationism "not appropriate to support the science curriculum", many science teachers may be using Discovery…
Creationism in Public Schools and the Fairness Argument
I've long been active in the battle over the teaching of evolution in public schools. One of the arguments that we hear quite often is the "Fairness Argument". It goes like this: There are two explanations for the existence of life on earth, either life evolved by "random chance" (evolution) or it…
Separation of church and state establishes a new religion!
Whoa. Somehow, I think I've ended up in the Bizarro Universe. New Scientist reports that the Discovery Institute has a problem with the information for teachers that accompanied the recent Judgment Day documentary. The teaching package states: "Q: Can you accept evolution and still believe in…

Paging Dr. Dembski to the White Misery Phone. Paging Dr. Dembski...

BWA HA HA HA HA HA!

Oh, Dembski's too busy running away from his support of a holocaust denialist.

As J-Dog has so eloquently put it:

BWA HA HA HA HA HA!

Bob

Yay!!!!!!

By Luna_the_cat (not verified) on 26 Jun 2007 #permalink

Very good J-Dog! Made me laugh out loud. I can't wait to see what kind of whiny "but, but, but..." reply the Discovery Institute puts out. Nothing yet today. I love reading in every whiny report how the I.D. concept was "misrepresented" by the reporter, scientist, etc. Ironic when that's their whole strategy to try to discredit evolution. I believe the saying is "hoisted on their own petard."