My longtime readers will know that I have often mentioned David Barton, a pseudo-historian who is astonishingly popular with the religious right, and usually with contempt. Barton is probably responsible for more popular myths about church and state and the views of our founding fathers than any other man alive. I came across this critique of his most influential work yesterday. The critique was issued by the Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs. Very much worth reading to pick out the innumerable falsehoods and distortions found in his work.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
According to Agape Press, the Texas State Board of Education has severed its ties to the National Association of State School Boards because its policies, in their view, "continue to gravitate to liberal left."
Last week, the Texas State Board of Education voted 10-5 to remove itself from…
Jon Rowe and I have spent much of the last two years pointing out the numerous false quotations and false claims about the religious views of the founding fathers that are tossed about by both sides in debate over church/state separation. While false quotes are not as common on the separationist…
Having totally borked science education in the Lone Star State, the Texas School Board is now winding up to stuff their right wing ideologies into the Social Studies curriculum.
I for one can't wait until Texas leaves the Union so we can put Texas and Turkey in the same category and begin to…
Jon Rowe and I have spent a good deal of time over the last couple years documenting the numerous fake quotations from the founding fathers that circulate among the religious right continually, almost all of them traced back to David Barton and his pseudo-historical books and videos. No matter how…
This is really hilarious history! In fact, George Washington was a young commander in one of the first skirmishes of the French and Indian War at Jumonville's Glen in 1754—he lost control of his troops and they massacred a French encampment on the Virginia frontier, killing all but one of the wounded, while Washington stood and did nothing. After the slaughter, the wounded French commander, one ensign Jumonville, told Washington he had been sent as a peaceful emmisary on behalf of Louis XV. The response from Washington's Indian ally, chief Tanaghrisson, was to cleave open ensign Jumonville's skull with his hatchet and wash his hands in the Frenchman's braincase.
Read Fred Anderson's history Crucible of War: The Seven Years' War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766 for a complete account of the French and Indian War and its deep impact on American history.
Fascinating analysis of these spurious claims - thanks for posting it Ed.
I will say, though, that the Baptist Committee missed a key point in undermining Barton's discussion of the rise of "social ills" after the court decisions of 62 - 63. The divorce rate in this country really began to climb in the post WWII period, not in the 60s. It may have increased even more during the 60s and 70s, but the real impact of divorce on the nation begain 20 - 30 years prior.