While I'm on the subject of originalism and constitutional interpretation, I really should link to Timothy Sandefur's brilliant article in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy entitled Liberal Originalism: A Past for The Future and to Randy Barnett's equally brilliant article, An Originalism for Non-Originalists. Both articles help flesh out the idea of liberal originalism, an originalism based upon the application of the founding principles found in the Declaration rather than on the letter of the law at the time of the founding.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Despite the fact that the first thing he did upon returning from his weekend getaway was bust my chops for my take on the Dan Rather fake memo story (LOL), I'd like to congratulate Timothy Sandefur both on his award from the Clarement Institute and on the recent publication of his article about the…
The Boston Globe had an article written by Dave Denison about judicial activism on Sunday. The results were mixed. On the one hand, Denison does a fine job of illustrating what I have said previously (here and here, among other essays), that claims of "judicial activism" rarely have any objective…
Jason Kuznicki has followed my lead in giving a positive review to Timothy Sandefur's recent article on liberal originalism in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. Incidentally, Jon Rowe agreed with us as well. Mr. Sandefur sent copies of the article to the three of us (and perhaps others…
James Ryan has a very interesting review of two books that critique originalism as a compelling theory of constitutional interpretation available at SSRN (it will be published in the Stanford Law Review soon). One of the books he reviews, Active Liberty, is written by none other than Supreme Court…
I for one will take a look. :)
I sometimes think we do ourselves a disservice when we restrict the "founding" principles to the textual efforts of Jefferson, Madison, Adams, Franklin, et al. We do owe the French a bit of praise as well, particularly Molière, Voltaire, and Rousseau, when we examine the "original." Just a thought!
Eric-
I'll look forward to hearing your thoughts on the matter. You might be interested in Positive Liberty, a group blog that I write for. All four contributors are advocates of liberal originalism (liberal in the classical sense, not the modern political sense). Tim Sandefur, whose article I link to above, is one of the contributors there. In addition to him and Randy Barnett, you might want to check out Scott Alan Gerber's work in this regard.
I'd actually recently started following Positive Liberty, as it happens.