Great Quote

From one of the diarists at DailyKos comes this quote from Jamie Raskin, a law professor at American University. He was testifying in front of a Maryland legislative committee on an anti-gay marriage amendment and one of the legislators used the Bible to support her arguments against gay marriage. Raskin replied:

Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn't place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.

Bravissimo.

When I read that piece, I immediately thought of Lloyd Bentsen's famous retort to Dan Quayle during their 1988 VP debate:

Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy, I knew Jack Kennedy, Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you are no Jack Kennedy.

Another quotation for the ages.

Hmm, looks like there's a couple of different versions of that quote on Raskin's own web page.

http://www.raskin06.com/news/06-03-02.baltsun.php

http://www.raskin06.com/

Also some bloggers are saying that the room erupted into applause, however the Baltimore Sun article says, "Some in the room applauded."

By the way, I wonder if we can expect to be hearing yet another Pat Robertson apology soon. I wonder if he does that crap on purpose. Maybe he's just completely bonkers. Maybe both!

As a freshman at AU, I would like to state that this quote is TOTALLY AWESOME. YEAH!

That is all.

By FishyFred (not verified) on 14 Mar 2006 #permalink

As a freshman at AU, I would like to state that this quote is TOTALLY AWESOME. YEAH!

Here's a cool quote: "I have so much money I don't know what to do with it... I think I'll cure world hunger and banish all disease with my magic wand! The whole room breaks out into a roaring applause!"

Awesome!

Bravo to Senator Nancy Jacobs, too, for lobbing that slow pitch. It's a refreshing change from the debate in my state legislature's discussion of the issue. Legislators are refusing to engage the actual question of whether gays deserve marriage, instead using clinical arguments about the public's right to vote on the issue. If only they could be forced to answer the question, Why?