Vaccines for the developing world jeopardized by spat

The leaders of the G8 meet this weekend in St. Petersburg (aka Leningrad aka Petrograd) and they were supposed to announce a business-friendly scheme to get drug companies to make vaccines for the developing world. Looks like it isn't going to happen, though, because the US and France are arguing over whether the US will back a French proposal for an international airline ticket tax to pay for aid to poor countries (Wall Street Journal). Germany and Japan are also balking at contributing to the plan, so there it sits, despite former claims of support by all parties:

The situation marks a sharp reversal for the initiative. The proposal appeared to be on the fast track in February when G-8 finance ministers, including then-Treasury Secretary John Snow, endorsed the idea. At that time, the ministers expected to agree by April on a pilot project to tackle at least one deadly infectious disease.

That meeting led to creation of a panel of experts, who recommended that the first advance market commitment be used to promote development of a vaccine for pneumococcal disease. According to the World Health Organization, the bacterial infection killed 1.6 million people in 2002, 716,000 of them under the age of 5. The panel suggested that the approach could help generate a vaccine for malaria, which kills one million people a year, but predicted that it would take longer than a pneumococcus vaccine.

G-8 officials say that drug companies, although initially skeptical, have rallied behind the idea. "They're ready to give this a go," said the official familiar with the G-8 discussions. (WSJ)

The problem is an old one. Drug companies don't want to make products for people who can't afford them -- more than not affording them, who can't afford to pay prices that will guarantee an obscene profit for Big Pharma. So the G-8 countries would guarantee a subsidy in exchange for an agreement the company would produce a vaccine to meet specified safety and efficacy standards. When the subsidy was spent, the vaccine would be sold to the developing world at sharp discounts.

The French proposal is complementary, financing it with an airline ticket tax. The French have themselves begun by imposing a one Euro tax on their own domestic coach tickets, ten Euros on First and Business Class to pay for AIDS drugs in poor countries. They say they have convinced thirteen other countries to follow suit, but the US is refusing, as is Japan. No new taxes, you know. Imagine what the Republican base could do with taxes to pay for AIDS drugs. So the French turned around and blocked the US backed subsidy plan.

Children! children!

Tags

More like this

SciDev.Net's TV Padma reports that tuberculosis experts are looking to India to develop affordable TB-testing kits. An estimated four million cases of the disease go undetected, and two million TB patients die every year. India has increased its efforts at finding and treating cases of the disease…
We SciBloggers were posed with this question: To what extent do you worry about AIDS, either with respect to yourself, your children, or the world at large? Here's what really worries me about AIDS (from the old Retrospectacle): The Federal Chief of AIDS research recently said that he believed that…
Last year, I taught a short course at Gilead Sciences in California and was impressed by not only the high quality of their scientific research but their efforts to increase access of their HIV medications to developing countries. Now Gilead has joined a group of pharmaceutical companies to try…
In an article reviewing the success of the Euro, the WSJ attributes at least some of the finiancial instability of recent months to currency volatility between the US and Europe. The Euro has had numerous benefits: Travel was made easier, as was trade and investment. Interest rates fell. Prices…