"Unlicensed Acupuncturist intentionally infects patients with HIV" Wait, what?

This story has been making the rounds online--

Unlicensed Acupuncturist intentionally infects patients with HIV

Unlicensed Acupuncturist Charged In 16 HIV Infections In Switzerland

Swiss acupuncturist charged in 16 HIV infections

Swiss "healer" accused of intentionally infecting 16 people with HIV using acupuncture needles

-- I only have the details you all can see there. Im not exactly sure what to make of this.

Long-time readers of ERV might expect me to do a post on how a psychotic woo-meister used his powers of woo to kill people, the trust people put into woo-ers who are uneducated charlatans vs physicians who spend years and years and years of their lives becoming experts...

But Im not.

Because without more details, I dont actually believe this story.

Here is the problem:

The man who is not HIV positive himself...

You all know Im not one for defending woo-ers, 'unlicensed' or not (lol, does it matter whether you have a made up degree in a made up topic?), but I dont get how what this man is accused of is possible, in light of the fact he is not HIV-1 positive.

The irony of HIV-1 is that safe inside the warm confines of the human body, it kills millions of people every year, it evades every drug treatment strategy we throw at it, it laughs in the faces of our attempts at vaccines.  Outside of the human body, however, it is a total wuss.  You look at it sideways and it falls apart.

Thats why the rumor that terrorists were planting 'HIV infected' bombs was stupid.  There is no way HIV would survive as an infectious agent through all of that.

The reason why people can become infected via IV drug use is that 1) people are sharing needles.  There isnt very much time between one person shooting up and the next.  And 2) a needle one uses for shooting up can hold blood.  A droplet of HIV infected blood can sit in a needle, protected from oxygen.

Do you see where this story isnt making sense?

The man accused of infecting these people with HIV-1 is not HIV positive.  He would need to stick an infected person, and then immediately stick an uninfected person, if this was going to even have a chance of working as a psychotic murderous plan.  And, he was using acupuncture needles, not syringe needles.  There is nowhere for an HIV infected droplet to hide from the drying effects of oxygen.  So he couldnt just infect a whole bunch of needles while no one was around, and then use them whenever he wanted to infect people.  The blood would dry, and the HIV would be dead.

And ultimately, this is like a murder case where they cannot find the weapon, and they cannot connect a weapon to the accused murderer.  Where is the HIV-1 infected individual this man was supposedly getting the HIV-1 from?  What is his connection to this HIV-1 positive individual?

No motive.  No weapon.  And from my perspective, no viable explanation for how this murderous plot was carried out.

An equally (if not more) valid hypothesis is that one of the students was HIV-1 infected, either through sex or IV drug use, and spread it to the others, either through sex or IV drug use.  A local 'hot spot' of infection you could (can) see in bars where lots of sex/drugs is going on (Ive read papers on different individuals getting infected by the same person on/near the same night).  And now their teacher is their scape-goat.

I dont know.

But without more details, I cant 'convict' this guy from a scientific perspective.

More like this

Read on my GoogleNews today: Taliban Reportedly Adding HIV-Infected Needles to Explosive Devices Hypodermic syringes are reportedly hidden below the surface of explosive devices, pointing upwards to prick bomb squad experts as they hunt for devices. The needles are feared to be contaminated with…
A few weeks ago, Slate ran this pointed article about the FDAs refusal to allow homosexual men to donate blood. Quick summary: Yes, homosexual men are 'at risk' for HIV-1 infection. But the majority of HIV-1+ homosexual men are aware of their status, thanks to increased HIV-1 awareness in their…
If you are HIV-1 positive, you cant have unprotected sex without telling your partner your HIV-1 status. You cant get drunk with your new boy/girlfriend, go back to their place, and have a night of unprotected passion. You cant do that. Even if you are an HIV-1 Denier, you cant do that. After you…
Im glad none of you accused me of joking or exaggerating when I told this story: A *very* common exchange I have with the general public regarding HIV-1: Person-- Where did HIV-1 come from? Me-- HIV-1 is related to a virus we can find in African primates, SIV. SIV crossed over from chimpanzees to…

Interesting.

As usual, you raise the standards of actual skeptical thinking back to where they ought to be.

And that right there? Is a lesson in and of itself.

Still, it's an interesting thing: we humans love to jump to the more insidious "conclusion" rather than face the actual facts. Were it not so, this story never would've got any traction.

By Bob Powers (not verified) on 03 Sep 2012 #permalink

Yes, good thinking. I'd dismissed on the basis of a murdering individual crops up anywhere but I'd have been more interested if he had accidentally done it as an example of the dangers of acupuncture. But from your analysis, it probably didn't happen at all.

It's been over ten years since the cops cleared Needle Park in Zurich (hour-and-a-half drive from Berne center).
http://www.sptimes.com/News/073101/Worldandnation/Heroin_for_addicts_wo…
It was pretty bad, by all accounts, and worst of all didn't bloody work.
http://picturesandperspectives.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/switzerland-platz…
So they brought it indoors, and even started prescribing, like they used to do when I was a kid.
They seem to have got The Virus rate down, possibly.

I just wonder , seeing as how the first complaint was got up only three years after the parks and so on were cleared, and how people were being encouraged to adopt new, "healthier" activities, clean themselves up, and so on, in what exact demographic this clown's acolytes originated?

By dustbubble (not verified) on 03 Sep 2012 #permalink

Levi, the woo part of acupuncture is all the 'traditional chinese' stuff. It doesnt actually matter where you stick the needles, and it doesnt matter if you dont stick them in "properly", you still get the benefit:
http://psych.imng.com/fileadmin/content_pdf/cpn/archive_pdf/vol36iss2/7…
It seems quite likely that acupuncture works via the placebo effect. Thus, it works quite well for diseases with a strong psychosocial component, such as back pain. For diseases which are more physiological such as cancer or infection, the benefit is close to zero.

@orac
From what I found in german and swiss newspapers, the selfstyled Accupuncutre/Healer supposedly used blood from HIV positiv persons and the stabbing was not necessarily done by accupuncture needles, probably a syringe. None of the victims knows with what he did it, only that they were stabbed with something. Some claim that they have been drugged by him. Still no motiv though. Seems an nice person to have around, according to one article he also threatened to kill his wife.

From a (in general) reliable german newspaper:
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/kriminalfall-in-der-schweiz-heiler-…

Take care,
nastes

sorry @orac was supposed to be @ERV

@Levi, Yes, acupuncture is woo based on faulty assumptions about how the human body works.

@ERV, maybe we'd get a better idea if they sequence the various viruses from the 16 HIV+ people. We'd expect them to be more closely related to each other if they're telling the truth, right?

By Poodle Stomper (not verified) on 04 Sep 2012 #permalink

Poodle-- Well, if one person ended up (either directly or indirectly) infecting the rest, all 16 will look similar too.

I think maybe you could sequence lots of genomes from each person. If one person did it, they would be the root and everyone else would be a branch. But I dunno what time-frame we are dealing with here, exactly...

Interesting comments on an interesting original blog. My thoughts, since one commentator DID have more knowledge about the matter, is that apparently no one saw him do the dirty deeds of infecting people. It must have been done while they were laying on their stomachs. If so, how do we know for sure it was the acupuncturist that did it? It could have been done before or after their therapy visit, by some other person or means, and then blamed on him. Competition, anyone?

By Wendy Smith (not verified) on 06 Sep 2012 #permalink

Don't forget the obvious: many people who cannot afford all of those 'experts' often resort to holistic medicine because it's cheaper.

And--because most of the people that so-called science attracts are trapped in traditional-box thinking--don't forget that many drug and addiction clinics and out-patient facilities ( often funded by the state) try non-traditional medicine as a way to introduce street people to the strange idea of "being cared for."

Or, in short, who were ALL the people in the sample? where did they come from in a socio-economic sense?

But either way, based on personal experience, i think you are dead wrong about what you presume is 'woo'--or at the very least, you have never suffered a malady that forced you to look beyond traditional medicine.

A simple example of the woo that you might well buy into is yoga....

By pornalysis (not verified) on 04 Dec 2012 #permalink