Animated Fitness Landscape: Its a Jack-In-The-Box for nerds!

Via John Wilkins and John Farrell:

A Simple Visualization of How Species Evolve

This is basically my dissertation, animated. LOL!!

What are you looking at?

Every pixel in that square is a genetic sequence. Some of those sequences confer a higher fitness advantage (the red colored peaks) or disadvantage (below the plane). The Blue color is neutral.

The grey dots are individual organisms within a population (the swarm of grey dots). The population does not explore every inch of the landscape at the same time (not every human alive right now represents all potential human DNA combinations). But there are populations of grey dots, who cluster together because they are genetically closely related to one another.

As generations of 'dots' go by, the genetic makeup of offspring changes due to random mutations, and the population of dots moves around the fitness landscape. The higher a dot is on a the plane, the more likely it will to produce 'offspring' dots.

Depending on how the environment/selective pressures change, depending on the mutation rate of the organism, lots of interesting things can happen.

EXAMPLE: 2:00-2:37 is like a Jack-In-The-Box for evilution junkies.

I started squealing, giggling, and clapping my hands at 2:37, like a goddamn delighted infant.

Then I thought about it later, and started laughing again.

When you think Darwin, you think "Survival of the Fittest!" "Onward and Upward!" Reach for the TOP of a fitness peak!...

Well, populations can reach a fitness peak... but then cant *stay* there. Random mutations occur, and they slip off the peak. Of course they could get back on again, after some more random mutations, but still-- Even if populations reach the top, they cant stay there. How long they can stay there depends on their mutation rate.

Thats where HIV is different. Instead of discreet fitness peaks, HIV operates on a fitness plateau. A high-mutation rate organism like HIV has no use for high, narrow fitness peaks at all. Certainly one might evolve, here or there, but the second the virus multiplies it will introduce mutations, and the population will immediately fall off of the peak. Broad, flat plateaus, however, are 'safe' for high mutators. The populations can explore a *lot* of sequence space (reproduce a lot, make a lot of mutations), and still reproduce just fine.

Of course, ultimately, this topic is much more complex than this video conveys, but I think it is a *fantastic* video that gets the main ideas of fitness landscapes right, appropriate for a general audience AND not-so-evolution-and-population-dynamics-inclined scientists. I would have totally used this in my defense.


Edited to add: One of the animations creators, Bjørn Østman, has a blog!


And he recently did an AMA!

More like this

Last time I talked about why treating cancer is so hard:Why havent we cured cancer yeeeeeet? Briefly, scientists did complete genome sequencing of seven individuals prostate tumors, and things were all kinds of jacked up. Not only were all seven tumors different, but one tumor had over 200…
A few weeks ago I purchased what I have since referred to as a "coffee table book for nerds," Martin Novak's Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life, a richly illustrated hardcover which is eminently browsable. In keeping with the focus of Nowak's own researches the chapters in this…
The Properties of Adaptive Walks in Evolving Populations of Fungus: The rarity of beneficial mutations has frustrated efforts to develop a quantitative theory of adaptation. Recent models of adaptive walks, the sequential substitution of beneficial mutations by selection, make two compelling…
An astute reader pointed me towards a monstrosity of pompous bogus math. It's an oldie, but I hadn't seen it before, and it was just referenced by my old buddy Sal Cordova in a thread on one of the DI blogs. It's a "debate" posted online by Lee Spetner, in which he rehashes the typical bogus…

Excellent video and presentation of information in a unique way. Thanks for sharing it (and for the additional explanation for us laypeople)!

By Steven Trisel (not verified) on 16 Apr 2014 #permalink

I get that the beginning of the video is changing where the selective advantage is and seeing how stuff changes - it would be cool to model this (for HIV specifically) when you toss in different drugs (antibiotics for bacteria or anti retrovirals for HIV) or combinations of drugs.

This is a really cool video, also a great visualisation for those studying machine learning via artificial neural networks.

By James Weakley (not verified) on 25 Apr 2014 #permalink