Talk amongst yourselves.

I'm hammering away at the next edition of Tangled Bank (going up tomorrow) -- plus, you know, teaching and stuff -- but I wanted to give you a little something to work on. From New Scientist:

YOU could be forgiven for thinking that scientific fraud was in fashion. Weeks after the cloning superstar Woo Suk Hwang admitted faking research using human embryos, doubts have been cast over two other high-profile scientists.

Jon Sudbo of the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, has already admitted inventing a study into whether anti-inflammatory drugs can improve the prognosis for oral cancer patients, which was published in The Lancet in 2005. But fresh concerns have now been raised over papers published in the New England Journal of Medicine in April 2001 and April 2004 and the Journal of Clinical Oncology in October 2005.

...

Meanwhile on Monday, the newspaper Japan Today alleged that Kazunari Taira, a biochemist at the University of Tokyo, faked his research into coaxing E. coli bacteria to produce a human enzyme called Dicer. A university investigation team is preparing a report on the matter.

Has peer pressure replaced peer review? ("All the cool scientists are covered by the major networks!") Is this evidence of a new epidemic of cheating, or of a new epidemic of catching cheaters? Or is this all a ploy to distract us from the hurried development of a super-secret weapon by which the scientists will finally zap scientific literacy directly into our skulls, the better to get new recruits? ("One of us! One of us!")

Report your findings in the comments.

Tags

More like this

So…Intelligent Design creationists have a research program? It's just super-secret, because those real scientists might criticize it, lower its self-esteem, and make it wither away under our skeptical eye. I've heard the same argument from astrologers, homeopaths, and reflexologists.
The best challah I ever tasted, baked by my daughter.: Super-secret recipe and special braiding technique: the mother-daughter team produced a work of art tonight
Even though they'll never admit it, I imagine the creationists allied with the Disco institute are hurting pretty bad right now. Other bloggers have already covered the carnage so I'll just put up some links rather than write up a summary of what's already been said, but the beating ID has received…
This is really suspicious - magic perhaps! Every time I make a wish (and whisper it in prayer to the, hushhhhh, super-secret gods of atheists) for a favourite blog to get invited to join Scienceblogs.com, that actually happens in a matter of a few days. Poof! Just like that. Just look at today…

This isn't exactly related to the post - I was just wondering, how did you change from chemistry to philosophy? What little career steps were involved -- if you don't mind my asking.

- From an academic considering a career change.

It's not as if we have the statistics to say one way or the other, but these sensations happen over and over. Awhile back there was David Baltimore and more recently the physicist at Bell Labs with pubs in Science (Nature?). Then didn't the Amazing Randy debunk a scientist or two? Something to do with structuring water or homepathy and the editor of Nature getting involved. I dunno. This Korea thing strikes me as so utterly familiar I don't even care to know the details.