Life Science Blog Aggregator

Stew from Flags and Lollipops has begun a new life science blog aggregator, postgenomic. Here is how he describes it:

Postgenomic aggregates posts from life science blogs and then does useful and interesting things with that data.

For example, it allows you to get an instant picture of what news stories are being heavily linked to by researchers in the medical sciences, or which papers are being cited or reviewed most often, or which buzzwords are being used the most frequently.

It's sort of like a hot papers meeting with the entire biomed blogging community.

Sort of.

He asks that you add some special tags to your posts so that they can more efficiently be aggregated and analyzed. I'm not too keen on marking up my posts -- no Technorati tags here -- but if you're into that kind of stuff, you should check it out.

From the list of life sciences blogs I see that my posts average 400 words and 4.5 links.

Tags

More like this

Less than a week after its official launch, ResearchBlogging.org now has 78 active, registered users. We're already bigger than ScienceBlogs.com! Of course, many of our users are ScienceBloggers -- these projects can definitely work together. We can also get much bigger. Over 200 bloggers have used…
Dave Munger is part of the numerous North Carolinian contingent here at Scienceblogs.com. He writes the Cognitive Daily blog and runs the ResearchBlogging.org blog aggregator. At the Science Blogging Conference two weeks ago, Dave led a session on Building interactivity into your blog. Welcome to…
Regular blog readers are familiar with the rule of thumb that every three months or so there will be another outbreak of blog posts wondering where all the women are. Clancy at Culture Cat provides and extensive list of links to discussions of this question up to March 2005; I'm not sure this data…
From quite early on in my blogging endeavor, I was interested in exploring science blogging, what it is, what it can do, and what it can become. So, check out some of my earliest thoughts on this here and here. Then, over about a month (from April 17, 2006 to May 17, 2006) I wrote a gazillion…

Thanks for the tip.

I'm not much into tagging either. I think it's inefficient, incomplete, and won't stand the test of time. A keyword search should be enough.

4.5 outgoing links. If I got 4.5 incoming links per post, I'd be pretty kick ass.

I think he compiles the stats based on RSS/Atom feeds. That means that if your feed is only a partial entry or excludes links, the stats will be messed up.