You Say Hybridization, Hawks Says Hype

i-f1ad63d245246ace924cd0d15bcc8f77-public-enemy.jpg

John Hawks reads the papers so that I don't have to. Here is Hawks's reply to the human-chimp speciation paper I mentioned in the previous post. The basic conclusion that Hawks reaches: Don't believe the hype. The data analysis in the paper is sound, but the conclusions the authors draw are designed explicitly for the sake of generating publicity. It's like Chuck D doing the data analysis, then Flavor Flav gettin' all janky with his big ol' clock around his neck screaming "Hybridization!" Hawks claims that there is no need to invoke the hybridization model to explain the data. He presents a pretty convincing argument -- he says the data can be explained by effective population size and selection on the X chromosome, sans hybridization. Go read it.

More like this

Ah...busy with other things, and Evolgen pounced on this story of hybrdization in the midst of the split between the pre-human and pre-chimpanzee lineages 5-7 million years ago. Carl Zimmer offers some social perspective, while John Hawks tears into the science (tears, cuts and bludgeons, actually…
The New York Times is reporting on new data concerning the date of the evolutionary split between the human and chimapnzee lineages: Scientists are re-evaluating a pivotal event in human evolution, the split between the human and chimpanzee lineages, in light of a startling new comparison of the…
I know you're thinking we've had more than enough discussion of one simplistic umbrella hypothesis for the origin of unique human traits — the aquatic ape hypothesis — and it's cruel of me to introduce another, but who knows, maybe the proponents of each will collide and mutually annihilate each…
Yes, but not necessarily because it is wrong. Some time ago researchers proposed that the modern DNA signal indicated that chimps and humans continued to interbreed long after they split in evolutionary time. A new study refutes this, and as the author states, this new study is more correct…

Dude, seriously. I mean Public Enemy? Flavor Flav? You must be at least as old as me.

Love the blog, btw.

Sincerely,
Some 32 years old guy