1. evolgen
  2. 10 Assertions about Evolution

10 Assertions about Evolution

By evolgen on August 14, 2006.

Razib wants us to come up with 10 assertions of 10 words or less which we believe that the public should know about evolutionary science. He also wants us to come up with our list before looking at his list, which means we're left to figure out what the hell he means without seeing any examples. My stab at this is below the fold, but you should come up with your own list before reading Razib's or mine (according to Razib).

10 Assertions about Evolution, in no particular order:

  1. Common ancestry is supported by multiple, independent lines of evidence.

  2. Evolution is not an entirely random process.

  3. Natural selection is not the only evolutionary force.

  4. Mutations are not always deleterious.

  5. Evolutionary biology is a dynamic field

  6. Paradigm shifts in evolutionary theory do not undermine evolution.

  7. Creationism has not contributed to any paradigm shifts.

  8. Evolution is not atheist doctrine.

  9. Evolutionary biology is biology -- all biology comes from evolution.

  10. Evolutionary biology is science, like physics and chemistry.

Note: I read Razib's list after creating mine. I tried to keep focused on the science (as Razib does in his list), but I found myself drifting into the "culture wars" stuff a couple of times. If we're talking to the general public, I think it's important to point out how creationism is bullshit when we teach them about evolution.

Tags
Anti-Science
evolution
Science Education

More like this

Woodward in Washington D.C. Part Four.
Woodward closed by gushing about Ralph Seelke, who is a biologist at the University of Wisconsin, Superior. His web page carries a large disclaimer that his views do not represent the views of the university. That's never a good sign. The site also has various pro-ID articles and links. He…
Fisking the Discovery Institute on Evolution in Georgia
Stephen Meyer and John Angus Campbell of the Discovery Institute had an op-ed piece in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Sunday concerning the recent flap over evolution in the science curriculum in Georgia. In a way, you have to admire how skillfully the Intelligent Design (ID) movement has…
Evolution is Not in Crisis
If I told you that evolution was in crisis, what would you think I meant? You would probably think I meant that the theory was on its way out. You would think that new discoveries had shown the untenability of evolution, and that biologists were in despair over their lack of a central organizing…
What Sam Brownback thinks about evolution
In today's NYT It's softer than the outright denial of evolution that was assumed when he raised his hand at the debate, and certainly doesn't sound like young-earth creationism. It seems to be intelligent design creationism without explicitly mentioning intelligent design - although some keywords…

my only problem with this is calling them "assertions". from a philosophical stance, it implies that it is without question.

these are facts about evolution, but don't call them assertions. when to the creationist, an assertion is "God created the universe", as asserted by the bible they accept as literal truth, then us calling facts of evolution assertions means that they CAN pull the "see, evolution is a religion" crap argument and get away with it.

they play games with vocabulary - its best not to fall into the games they want to play because it means THEY frame the argument and continue to sway the uneducated.

By Joe Shelby (not verified) on 14 Aug 2006 #permalink

Joe, good point. I didn't come up with the term "assertions". That's razib's doing. Go bug him about the terminology.

Have you signed up for your FCD yet?

By somnilista, FCD (not verified) on 15 Aug 2006 #permalink