I got all excited when I read the following article title in the week's issue of PNAS:
Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences
I hoped the authors would discuss meiotic drive and segregation distortion. It turns out they're concerned with son preference and sex-selective abortion. I guess stuff like this doesn't really interest them.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Sorry for the light blogging this week. Finals are this week and next, and so I'm pretty swamped. Today I'm going to pose a straightforward but slightly counterintuitive probability question, of the sort that in modified forms aren't so uncommon in physics:
A densely populated authoritarian state…
Sometimes boys are worth more, sometimes girls are worth more. In an evolutionary sense. Or, more correctly, the value of a certain sex ... as an offspring ... can be measured in fitness terms. Fisher noted this and hypothesized this was the explanation for the 50-50 sex ratio we usually see.…
(Since Iâve actually been away from the computer all week, these links are all to posts from the previous week. Feel free to add some of this weekâs must-read blog posts in the comments.)
Several bloggers are keeping us up to speed on health policy and its implications. Rachel Gold and Elizabeth…
I'm a big fan of review articles. For those not in academic science, "review article" means a long (tens of pages) paper collecting together the important results of some field of science, and presenting an overview of the whole thing. These vary somewhat in just how specific they are-- some deal…