Another Nail in the Coffin for mtDNA

The most important nail was hammered in by this article -- a symbolic slap across the face to anyone who uses mtDNA, and mtDNA only, to study demography. An upcoming article in BMC Biology lays down another nail:

A study published today in the open access journal BMC Biology reveals that fewer than 10% of African American mitochondrial DNA sequences analysed can be matched to mitochondrial DNA from one single African ethnic group. There has been a growing interest in the use of mitochondrial DNA to trace maternal ancestries, and several companies now offer to analyse individuals' mitochondrial DNA sequences to obtain information about their origins. The current study suggests that only one in nine African Americans may be able to find clues about where their ancestors came from, in their mitochondrial DNA.

I can't find the actual article, so I'm only able to go by the press release.


Note: I am not opposed to people using mtDNA to make inferences regarding demographic history. I am opposed to them using only mtDNA to make those inferences. I am opposed to this practice for the same reason as I am opposed to people using any single marker to study demography. Demography affects the entire genome, so we should use as many markers as possible when investigating demographic history. One marker is not as many as possible.

More like this

John Hawks, along with Gene Expression regular Greg Cochran, has published a paper (PDF) on adaptive introgression in human evolution. In case the jargon is too much, we're talking about the caveman gene. Both Greg and John have blogged the paper. Check out what John says about mtDNA: However,…
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is one of the most used markers in molecular ecology1. A good molecular marker for population level studies should be neutral, so that researchers can use it to infer things like: Population size and changes in population size (expansions and bottlenecks); Population…
People like dogs. They're man's best friend, after all. There are tons of different breeds, many of which could be classified as unique species if we didn't know better. Our interest in dogs has led to lots of studies into dog breeding, figuring out which genes gave rise to the different…
Last September, Bruce Lahn and colleagues published a couple of papers on the evolution of two genes responsible for brain development in humans (ASPM and Microcephalin). A group led by Sally Otto published a criticism of the analysis performed by Lahn's group in last week's issue of Science (JP…

A provisional copy is up now...

By afarensis (not verified) on 12 Oct 2006 #permalink

I suppose that not everyone has a Y chromosome to trace. If you do, and you trace both, one supposes that one might get two different answers.