Revere on Nisbet

Over at Effect Measure, Revere takes a few shots at Matt Nisbet:

It's not just that the Dawkins/Hitchens “PR campaign provides emotional sustenance and talking points for many atheists,” although it does that too. It's that the various writings of Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, Hitchens, PZ and now a number of others has opened up a space -- and a wide space, not a narrow one -- to talk about belief and non-belief in ways not possible before. Even Matt's post is an example. I'm glad we are talking about the best way to talk about harmful delusions -- and make no mistake, that's exactly what we are talking about. It's not that religious ideas are just delusions. Delusions are plentiful, even in science. It's that by and large religious delusions are harmful delusions. The idea you can separate the fat from the muscle (the Good from the Bad in religion) runs up against the brute fact religious meat is marbled meat and the fat is a major risk factor for a lethal disease of the heart.

I think that sums it up well. My own take on Nisbet is available here.

Tags

More like this

I don't mean to pick a fight with a fellow Science Blogger, but I'm afraid I have to. If not a fight, at least register a strenuous remonstrance, if I may frame it that way. The object of my displeasure is Matt Nisbet over at Framing Science, who seems to have a bee in his neurons about what he…
Gladius in one hand and scutum in the other, I enter the SciBling Colosseum... Ave Caesar, morituri te salutant (Gladiators didn't actually say that, but adds a nice touch, no?) Matt and Revere are already battling over two topics that always seem to provide a good show for spectators and…
In provoking the emotions of fear and anger among non-believers, the Dawkins-Hitchens PR campaign motivates many atheists to be ever more vocal in attacking and complaining about religion. Yet does this PR campaign reach beyond the base, convincing Americans to give up their collective "delusions…
Since I'm criticizing my SciBlings today, permit me a few words about this post from Orli over at Neurontic. Orli is unimpressed with the recent glut of atheist books. She begins by reproducing a segment from a previous post: Dawkins and Dennett simply cannot understand the impulse to cling to an…

I like the meat analogy. That's something I can really sink my teeth into.

Oh, well, off to dinner.

~David D.G.

By David D.G. (not verified) on 27 Aug 2007 #permalink

Shrews actually do that. They have such fast metabolisms that they have to eat about eight times their weight every 24 hours. They are relentless predators. If you keep one overnight without food (and it can't go into its semi-hibernating dormant state) it will die. I read about someone keeping a few confined like that. If not fed for a while they start to eat themselves from the hind legs forward until they die. God's plan for shrews. Scary!