Scot McKnight, a Professor of New testament at Northern Seminary in Illinois, has posted a review of the Big Evolution/Creation Book. He describes it as “a good read,” though it is hard to pick out one quote that perfectly summarizes his reaction to it. So go have a look for yourself. You don't want to be the last one to read it!
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The name "Richard Gallagher" may be familiar to some readers. Gallagher is the editor of The Scientist, and last year, somewhat naively suggested that the evolution/creation "debate" was actually a good thing (you can find the text of his editorial at this site). Both PZ and Jason Rosenhouse took…
Please go away, Mr Bush. And please, President-elect Obama, clear away the rotting debris of this ghastly administration. The latest example of dreadful Bush appointees: Stephen Johnson, head of the EPA. Asked about the evolution/creation debate, this is what he had to say:
It's not a clean-cut…
This is a long post from January 23, 2005, trying to tie in Creationism and conservatism through psychology:
I always loved animals and always loved science. I read the kids' science and nature books and encyclopedias, as well as adult stuff, like huge volumes about animals e.g., "The Life of…
I tried. I really, honestly, sincerely tried. I've been struggling with this book, The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul(amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mario Beauregard and Denyse O'Leary, for the past week and a half, and I've finally decided it's not worth the…
The comments to the review are fascinating, if one is not (as I am not) used to that flora.
For the record, Jason, you've written a fair-minded, informed, and helpful book.
To find the greatest bang for your buck it's extremely recommended to buy your footwear through sanctioned sellers.