Why no posts? Housemoving, that's why

In case anyone thought that I had given into existential despair or had a major infarct or something, the answer is yes, I did, on both counts. Or, in other words, I moved house. It took five days, and I still don't have broadband back. And now I have something like a month's backlog, after the trip to the States and the move, so posting will continue to be light. Sorry.

In the meantime, I want to ask you all - what is evidence in biology? I am going to a conference in January, and I'm keen to see what you think counts for or against a biological hypothesis, particularly historical ones. It would help to have opinions to spout there...

More like this

I've decided to respond to Ana, Larry, and others in a new post rather than in a comment. This is partly because it is easier and more reliable for me to post than to comment under the present conditions. Which in truth are not really conducive to any kind of writing, but here goes. Ana, yes, I…
Has it really been that long? It was a dismally overcast Saturday five years ago when, on a whim after having read a TIME Magazine article about how 2004 was supposedly the Year of the Blogger, I sat down in front of my computer, found Blogspot, and the first incarnation of Respectful Insolence…
There are times when I want to fall down on my knees and give thanks for certain cranks. I mean, where would my blogging material come from, were it not for antivaccine loons, quacks, cranks, creationists, and animal rights terrorists providing me with an unending stream of blog fodder? Were they…
Continuing with the tradition from last two years, I will occasionally post interviews with some of the participants of the ScienceOnline2010 conference that was held in the Research Triangle Park, NC back in January. See all the interviews in this series here. You can check out previous years'…

> I am going to a conference in January

Oh, good!

Jason

John Wilkins wrote:

...Or, in other words, I moved house.

Please accept my deepest sympathy.

By Ian H Spedding FCD (not verified) on 30 Nov 2006 #permalink

I was going to drop you a note, Jason...

Thanks Ian. Now I have several months free to unpack and throw out all the family crap that I accumulated over 20 years.

What is evidence in biology? p<0.05.

Bob

Now I have several months free to unpack and throw out all the family crap that I accumulated over 20 years.

"Several months" - with Christmas just around the corner and a conference in January?

Good luck; presumably you're still in Brisvegas?

By Robin Levett (not verified) on 30 Nov 2006 #permalink

Try again...

What is evidence in biology? p is less than 0.05.

Bob

Hi John,
I'm going to ask for a little clarification here--evidence of what? Are we talking any hypothesis in biology, or hypotheses in a specific area. Evidence for, say, speciation will potentially be very different from evidence for, say, the adaptive significance of a particular behaviour.

Or maybe I'm missing the point--if so, please tell me.

I left it open for a reason - I just want to see what people immediately (or thoughtfully) say. Free associate - your favourite notion of evidence,,,

Why the specific evidence in biology? Do you think there is something conceptually different about biological evidence than for chemistry or physics or history or literature?

Do you think there is something conceptually different about biological evidence than for chemistry or physics or history or literature?

That remains to be seen. Personally I think biologists tend to handle evidence a little differently, with conventions that differ from, say, medicine or physics. Whether that matters is something I am unsure about. I know, fo rexample, that although the rest of the scientific world has given up using "null hypotheses", more or less, psychology still does that in a solid manner, which means that evidence can be chosen relative to the NH. And so on.