The year in review

Philosophy isn't one of those things that makes great breakthroughs that are recognised at the time. Generally something is thought of as a significant development much later, after it becomes obvious that people are engaging with it, like the Chinese Room of John Searle. So instead I will simply list my better posts of this year in a fit of self-aggrandisement.

January

Bioturbation and Darwin's worms

Another kind of agnosticism

The man who invented evolution

Species

February

Dads

Darwin on species: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3

Science and nonscience

Theory

The many faces of "evolution"

Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology

The Procrastination Principle [More on procrastination]

In praise of scientific ignorance - Claude Bernard

Progress, Primitive and Advanced

March

Water and reduction

The Myers Biological Song

The topic of the evolution of religion

Evolution and accident

Allopatry and sympatry

Linnaeus on species

On myths about Darwin

Darwin on the Irish

Scientific realism and inference to the best explanation

Instruction and information

The mystery of mysteries - early naturalistic views of species origins

[Whew - I must have been trying to evade some work that month]

April

On the incoherence of "Darwinism"

A Very Bad Idea: Commenting on the VT tragedy

Ancestors [Counting ancestors]

Literary Darwinism

On communication

On secularism

May

Thoughts on history and science

In praise of religious tolerance, even for atheists

The Secret? Sympathetic magic

Types, tokens, genera and species

Happy Birthday Linnaeus

Linnaeus on species

The world according to Genesis: The cosmos

June

The world according to Genesis: Stuff that grows

The world according to Genesis: Humanity

Philosophy is to science, as ornithologists are to birds, Part 1, part 2, part 3

The world according to Genesis: Moral knowledge

The world according to Genesis: Other peoples

The world according to Genesis: The Flood

The kangaroo is the first organism, but the fungus is not the biggest

"Species" in the Stanford Encyclopedia updated

The world according to Genesis: Language and society

Lewes on heredity in 1856

July

Explanation

August

What is an individual?

Popper peeps papally at UD

Tolerance and reason

Are species theoretical objects?

September

Theories of speciation

The meaning of "life"

What is "life", again?

What is "life", at last

The constancy of change and the lack of balance

October

How not to Feyerabend

What evolution is and what it is not (1897)

Explaining religion

Law, theory, or something else?

Explaining religion 2: What is religion?

Explaining religion 3: Is it adaptive?

November

Words and taxa

Upstream issues

Magnetic anomaly map finished (by guest blogger Chris Nedin)

Animals and rights

The library of the mind

Birds up

Explaining religion 4: Wolves and gods

Species as objects of explanation

Our inner ape

The two Wilsons on sociobiology: Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5

Physicists on science

One more thing about Davies

The philosophy of classification

December

Nationalism and evolution

Virgin births

A personal revelation

Do bacteria think?

A letter to a high school student

Traditions in academe (theology departments)

Taking drugs to enhance cognitive performance

There you go. Some holiday reading, or rereading if you are one of the six who read this blog regularly. It's not as sciencey as Catalogue of Organisms, or John Hawks Anthropology Weblog, or the wonderful Tetrapod Zoology, but it's me. The real me. Confused and scattered...

Categories

More like this

Darwin, evolution, and Popper Creationists often appeal to authority in the person of the well-known philosopher, Sir Karl Popper, who said, they say, that evolution is not scientific. Mark Isaak's marvellous Index to Creationist Claims is in the process of adding a section on this. I responded,…
Theory: A word that gets used a lot in discussing science, or attacking it. Theories are only verified hypotheses, verified by more or less numerous facts. Those verified by the most facts are the best, but even then they are never final, never to be absolutely believed. [Claude Bernard, 1865,…
Here at ScienceBlogs we often debate the best way of promoting science literacy generally, and an understanding of evolution in particular. Is a calm recital of the evidence a good approach, or does that merely come off as an uninspiring “data dump” to non-scientists? Does the vocal atheist wing…
Lately I have been a bit fixated on the arguments over evolution & creationism in America during the beginning of the 20th century (see here and here). As a result of further digging, I came across a few more resources that raise some interesting questions. First is a short article from the…

Thanks John, it's good to have all this in one spot.

Easier to clean up.

Just kidding.

Have a Merry Christmas. I hope you get to spend time with your kids.

By Gary Bohn (not verified) on 21 Dec 2007 #permalink

I personally think that your explication of Genesis from June is one of the finest workings of the topic I've ever seen, and some of the best writing of yours I know of. I'd love to see a "Wilkins interprets the Bible" sometime... I'd buy it, at least!

By Daniel Harper (not verified) on 21 Dec 2007 #permalink