Why wasn't I told?

A passing reference to Language Log has introduced me to an excellent blog. For instance, this well-balanced post on hate speech. Why didn't someone notify me of it before?

More like this

Final notes on the election This is it. This is the last time I'm talking about the election. I'm quite worn out and the Republican National Convention was the last straw. I am still feeling nauseated from it. So other than a few comments below, this is the LAST political commentary you will…
Yay! Going to get some new addition to 'Creationist Claims about ERVs', via this bucket of fail from Answers in Genesis:The Natural History of Retroviruses-- Exogenization vs Endogenization The best alternative explanation is that orthologous ERVs were created to occupy similar genomic loci in…
Come on, tell the truth. You all missed mynym, didn't you? Well let me show you his latest bit of stupidity, wherein he takes me to task for opposing censorship by a public university while banning him from leaving comments here. It seem that our favorite little halfwit still doesn't recognize the…
Regular readers of this blog will be well aware that we are currently in the middle of a technology-driven revolution in genetics, which promises both advances in our understanding of human biology and profound social transformation. As we move into the genomic era, developing familiarity with the…

Language log is a great blog, but that's not one of their better posts (anything by Mark Lieberman is great, though Pullum is usually excellent too). The only problem here is the excessive zeal and officiousness of the British police. Two local (to me) examples: Oxfordshire police charged a student with hate speech after he said to a policeman "do you realize your horse is gay?" And more recently, when someone threw a water bottle to a protestor sitting in a tree, the police charged him with littering. In both cases the courts threw out the cases and money was wasted.

By Neil Levy (not verified) on 25 Jan 2008 #permalink

Sorry. I rely on you to point me towards excellent blogs.

:o)

By Chris' Wills (not verified) on 25 Jan 2008 #permalink

That's what happens when you've hired too many police in the name of political expediency, and now they're looking for something to do to justify their existence. Apparently it happens on the left as well as the right (for the right, "security" is the buzzword, rather than hate-speech.)

I suppose that I simply assumed that, as one of the cool intellectual bloggers, you already knew about Language Log. In any event, glad you found it.

By Bill Benzon (not verified) on 25 Jan 2008 #permalink

Jeff, note in the 2 examples I gave if there was an agenda it was certainly not left-wing. In both cases (including the one using hate speech legislation) the target were environmental protestors. I suspect it is the police using a handy tool to do their master's bidding, not their promotion of a left-wing agenda.

By Neil Levy (not verified) on 25 Jan 2008 #permalink

Neil, it's the not the target but the source that I was considering. Maybe I'm wrong, but I see the British government as being somewhat to the left of the USA's. I also don't see them as actively promoting a left wing agenda. I wouldn't be surprised if many of them need to look like they're doing something.

I may be wrong in associating "security" with the right, though. I've heard the security in Britain is very tight - tracking everyone and their cars wherever they go, etc.

Jeff, *all* Western governments, probably all other properly elected governments, are to the left of the US govt. In any case, the decision to prosecute is not up to the govt: it is a police and DPP matter. Neither are conceivably left-wing.

By Neil Levy (not verified) on 27 Jan 2008 #permalink

I thought everyone knew about the greatness of Language Log. It's even cited in the latest NYRB.

By Ginger Yellow (not verified) on 30 Jan 2008 #permalink