What makes scientists laugh?

Well, chickens...

HT Darren Naish

Tags

More like this

Well, heck, Darren Naish has been posting here for a week, so it's past time to give a belated welcome to Tetrapod Zoology, the latest addition to the Scienceblogs family of fine sci-punditry.
Darren is away. Back soon. Here are sneak-peeks... The amazing freaky beast that's getting all the attention, that everyone gawps at in amazement (drumroll)... ... stands at centre-left in a white shirt. Yay, it's Witton's World of Pterosaurs. Photo above stolen from Benjamin Moon. Dave Martill…
I write about zoonoses (diseases transmitted between animals and humans) quite a bit here, but I don't think I've ever written about animal-human sex. Here at Scienceblogs, though, you never know what you'll find, and colleague Darren Naish has a post about, well, traumatic anal intercourse with a…
Well, put a collar on me and call me a bloodhound. It seems that dogs aren't wolves after all. Darren Naish, of Tetrapod Zoology, discusses a whole range of recent literature and the arguments for and against in a truly excellent post. The arguments against note the morphological and behavioural…

How many of those 68,700 were free range? It is a little hard to tell what the distribution is on the chart.

By Susan Silberstein (not verified) on 17 Jun 2008 #permalink

Egg!

By natural cynic (not verified) on 17 Jun 2008 #permalink

If you'll forgive the tangential OT here...

I was looking for an AIR (?) article the other day, and my vague recollection was that it was mocking the kind of boilerplate "directions for further research" summary that typically closes academic papers. The text has something along the lines of "No further research on this topic should be attempted, ever.". My google-fu is evidently weak, as I can't find the citation.

Does this ring any bells/URLs with anyone?