Good to see that Olivia Judson has finally caught up with me...
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This is my reply to a post by Coturnix called The Hopeless Monster? Not so fast!
First, the phylogeny of the discussion.
Olivia Judson wrote this:
The Monster Is Back, and It's Hopeful
Which was responded to here:
Hopeless Monsters--A Guest Post from Dr. Jerry Coyne
That dyad of posts was passed…
A bit o' squabble has broken out about hopeful monsters. As paleontologist evolutionary geneticist Jerry Coyne notes in a guest post at The Loom, Carl Zimmer's blog, hopeful monsters are the products of ... well, there's the problem: They were either the product of sudden large evolutionary forces…
Olivia Judson (aka, Dr. Tatiana) has a blog at the NYTimes website. It's usually a good read, but she has been known to go off the deep end. In this week's entry, Judson posts on how bones are not the only fossils. What other fossils does Judson write about? Genomes.
Judson's focus is on genome…
A hopeful monster is a mutant born with a genetically determined and large novel trait (compared to its parents) which confers enhanced fitness on that individual. This enhanced fitness increases the likelihood that the new mutant gene that determines this trait will be passed on and spread…
Can we also dump Copernicanism while we're about it?
I disagree that the problem with the "-ism" is that it suggests a finality to Darwins arguments,that he was the "beginning and end of evolutionary biology".
The term is not one usually used by scientists,its being propagated by Creationists,the DI and their ilk,and just represents their particular Goebbels-esque tendency to create "isms" to devalue certain theories by turning them into an -ism,Darwinist,Evulutionist etc.....
I'm relatively sure that Einsteinism needs to go, too, as well as ismism.
Ulrich Kutschera of the University of Kassel has suggested introducing the term "Darwin-Wallace principle of natural selection" (Nature 453:27, 2008).
I'm sure in German that's one word, too.
Let's see: Der Darwinische-WallaceischeSatzdernatürlicheAuslese...
How do Germans breathe, anyway?
What's that line from E. B. White? Something like "She dove into the sea of her sentence, and finally emerged, panting, on the other side, with her verb in her teeth."
(He probably used fewer commas. :))
Durch ihren Arschloch natuerlich!
*sigh*
Everyone's a comedian!
For values of E. B. White that equal S. L. Clemens, anyway.
"Whenever the literary German dives into a sentence, that is the last you are going to see of him till he emerges on the other side of his Atlantic with his verb in his mouth."
Units are often called for names of discoverers: Ohms, Volts, Newtons, Einsteins, etc. Does anyone use the evolutionary unit, the Darwin? A Darwin is a 1% change in the gene pool of a population over one generation.
"Does anyone use the evolutionary unit, the Darwin? A Darwin is a 1% change in the gene pool of a population over one generation.
I think they should refer to a kilodarwin as a "gould".
(Incidentally, there seem to be different definitions of what a darwin is floating around, or are they equivalent and I just not understanding? (very, very possible).
According to Wikipedia a darwin is an e-fold amount of change over one million years, and was devised by J. B. S. Haldane. I think it is flawed because it assumes that rates of change are commensurable across the evolutionary tree in absolute terms, and this is a mistake.