Yes I did worry too much about that question (among others), but then I realized that the word "vowel" does indeed have vowels, so at least some self-referential order is restored in the universe. Why separate form and substance if you don't have to?
Fucking brilliant!
Hold on -- I thought of one: haÄek contains a haÄek!
(It works on preview. Of course, with ScienceBlogs horrible Unicode support, you'll probably just see some ASCII junk when I hit Post.)
Which is why you should use the HTML codes: háÄek... bugger!
Fücking brilliänt!
The above was written using HTML tags that don't work on your crüddy website!
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window.
There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can't use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
And why aren't all occurrences of the word "red" not red? And why do I see no websites that show every occurrence of the word "big" in font size=+8? And so on.
Since we're being pedantic - we weren't? well so what? - I am sure diaerisis is the correct spelling.
Now, on the thread subject, what about humans? - eg there was a minister in the New South Wales government called Aquilina with an aquiline nose; our esteemed Vice-Chancellor here at ANU is called Chubb and has a chubby face.
Questions for serious consideration - was Albert Schweitzer in fact Swiss? Was Ike Eisenhower from an ironworking family? Did either Roosevelt own a field of roses? (Did Margaret Thatcher teach Sir Geoffrey Howe? Sorry - couldn't resist it.)
The people want to know.
Alas, our Prime Minister Rudd is not especially ruddy-featured.
I am sure diaerisis is the correct spelling
Not in Greek, so there.
Hm. Fiddling with HTML entities...
Ümläüt?
háček?
háček?
Gesundheit!
WIN!
HTML Entities used:
Ümläüt?
háček? (NB: This uses the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON' (U+010D))
háček? (NB: This uses Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C (U+0063) COMBINING CARON (U+030C))
heh.
apo'strophe
ellip...sis
I'm a big fan of abbrev.
Yes I did worry too much about that question (among others), but then I realized that the word "vowel" does indeed have vowels, so at least some self-referential order is restored in the universe. Why separate form and substance if you don't have to?
Fucking brilliant!
Hold on -- I thought of one: haÄek contains a haÄek!
(It works on preview. Of course, with ScienceBlogs horrible Unicode support, you'll probably just see some ASCII junk when I hit Post.)
Which is why you should use the HTML codes: háÄek... bugger!
Fücking brilliänt!
The above was written using HTML tags that don't work on your crüddy website!
A simple trick will make sure that UTF-8 gets through: do not ever use the preview window.
There are sometimes spelling errors in my comments, because I can't use the preview for proofreading. The glorious umlaut in my name would get borked.
And why aren't all occurrences of the word "red" not red? And why do I see no websites that show every occurrence of the word "big" in font size=+8? And so on.
Since we're being pedantic - we weren't? well so what? - I am sure diaerisis is the correct spelling.
Now, on the thread subject, what about humans? - eg there was a minister in the New South Wales government called Aquilina with an aquiline nose; our esteemed Vice-Chancellor here at ANU is called Chubb and has a chubby face.
Questions for serious consideration - was Albert Schweitzer in fact Swiss? Was Ike Eisenhower from an ironworking family? Did either Roosevelt own a field of roses? (Did Margaret Thatcher teach Sir Geoffrey Howe? Sorry - couldn't resist it.)
The people want to know.
Alas, our Prime Minister Rudd is not especially ruddy-featured.
I am sure diaerisis is the correct spelling
Not in Greek, so there.
Hm. Fiddling with HTML entities...
Ümläüt?
háček?
háček?
Gesundheit!
WIN!
HTML Entities used:
Ümläüt?
háček? (NB: This uses the Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON' (U+010D))
háček? (NB: This uses Unicode character LATIN SMALL LETTER C (U+0063) COMBINING CARON (U+030C))
Reference used:
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/index.htm
Hm.
The server headers do not appear to include a character set specification.
The header of this page includes:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
Isn't that something you can directly configure to be UTF-8 on your end?