Roundup - not just for weeds!

Here is a roundup of links and stuff that I don't have time to blog on right now.

A. C. Grayling replies in a piece of beautiful snark to Steve Fuller's response to his review of Dissent over Descent. Thony is not permitted to point out any further historical inaccuracies...

Leiter reports that a philosopher who blogs, from Yeshiva, James Otteson, may have been removed because he said things on the blog that are sexist, or at least interpreted to be, according to Inside Higher Education.

Will Thomas at Ether Wave Propaganda has the first of a series on the historian Simon Schaeffer, on the historiography of science.

David Brooks, the NYT columnist and PBS commentator from the right, has an interesting article on whether the Republicans have any intellectual foundation for many of their standard talking points. [Hat tip Larry Arnhart]

Jake Young at Pure Pedantry has a takedown of philosopher Thomas Nagel's claim we should, after all, teach about creationism in schools. He rightly points out that Nagel doesn't know these people, the political motives, and indeed much of the science, let alone the propaedeutic exigencies. I was going to do this, but jake did it better.

A couple of papers at the journal Integrative and Comparative Biology are interesting: Lisa Kondrick on the role Thomism played in permitting Catholic schools and universities to teach natural philosophy separately from theology (gotta love an article whose abstract begins "There is no debate over the Theory of Evolution"). And Kevin Padian on how to incorporate more evolution in education through the use of "evograms", diagrams that better represent the nature of multiple lines of evidence for common descent.

Have fun. Back to marking, still....

More like this

Mohan Matthen, a philosopher of biology, has a very nice takedown of Thomas Nagel's qualified support for teaching creationism on his blog. Hat tip Leiter. Richard Losick has an excellent piece on the problems of using cultured lab strains when studying microbes, at Small Things Considered. A…
To celebrate the 4th anniversary of ID creationism's defeat in Dover, PA, the Disco. 'Tute is making things up. Having, it seems, nothing new to say on the subject, they've reposted an ill-argued and factually inaccurate essay by philosopher of the mind Thomas Nagel, prefacing it by claiming:…
Just in case you are still wondering why college professors tend to be politically liberal, the last few days have provided three examples that make my point perfectly. First up, we have this piece from Bret Stephens, writing at The Wall Street Journal. Stephens's piece is behind a pay-wall, but…
Philosopher Thomas Nagel recently published a book called Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. The general consensus was that the book delivered considerably less than it promised. H. Allen Orr's negative review from The New York…

Thanks for the links!:)

By Vanessa Angles (not verified) on 12 Sep 2008 #permalink

I'm surprised on that Nagel bit, especially after reading a little of his work on subjectivity and my pet why-am-i-me question. But then again, a quick skim of some of his other writings seemed hopelessly obscure to me, and I probably should have spent more time on him.

For some reason, reading Grayling's corrosive response to Fuller made me think of Dennett's "universal acid"...

By Ian H Spedding FCD (not verified) on 13 Sep 2008 #permalink

...as an aside, I'm sure you didn't ask Thony not to comment because he can sing better than you can?

By Ian H Spedding FCD (not verified) on 13 Sep 2008 #permalink

There's an update on the Yeshiva story on Leiter's blog:

UPDATE: Professor Otteson writes: "I saw your blog entry about the Inside Higher Ed article about me. I thought I should tell you that I'm not sure where they got their information, but it wasn't from me. We had policy differences about the honors program, yes, but I'm completely satisfied with what we decided to do. I think comparisons to Larry Summers are preposterous. I'm sure Yeshiva would say the same. I've told this to Inside Higher Ed, but I haven't received a response from them yet." The story did seem a bit thin on evidence, and now we know why!

So it was much ado about something else.

Ian: Rocks can sing better than that.

Thanks RBH. I was worried in case it meant the beginnings of an anti-blogging movement amongst philosophy departments.