An ancient cladogram

As I investigate the use of tree diagrams in the nineteenth century, I keep running across things that shouldn't be there. One of them was this book:

Herdman, William Abbott. 1885. A Phylogenetic Classification of Animals (For the Use of Students). London; Liverpool: Macmillan & Co.; Adam Holden.

It's on, but they didn't properly scan the figure on the foldout (a real problem of the electronic versions of old books is that they don't scan the foldout figures. Imagine the Origin without the one figure). So I bought a copy. It's a real revelation - he correctly uses "polyphyletic" in its modern sense on page 2. So below the fold is the figure and the caption, with a link to a larger version to download.

Of interest is that Herdman is mixing phylogeny with grades - the vertical axis represents "advance in structure", whatever that might mean. It's not cladism yet...

i-966f09c1b754681798c30235950a628a-sc00be357d-small.jpgi-b5014e04a13821b8c67ff239955a3050-sc00be9ef0text.jpgLarge version

More like this

The term "radical" is a very loose term. It basically means "something that differs wildly from the consensus" in ordinary usage. So I hope David Williams and Malte Ebach won't take offense if I say that they have a radical interpretation of the nature of classification. In a couple of recent…
The first research assignment for our Alaska NSF Chautauqua course has been posted. Your task is to find a wound-inducible plant gene, learn something about it, and post a description in the comment section. We've already had one excellent answer, but I know there are at least 54 wound-inducible…
This is the first in an irregular series of basic concepts in science, that I suggested to the Seed Bloggers we might do from time to time. If anyone wants to suggest a revision, because I got it wrong or am unclear, make a comment - this will be revised to make sure it is OK.Clade: this term of…
I've talked about this a bit at sessions I taught at my library and also at Web Search University but it's still a favorite.  Plus, you asked for posts on finding information. Oh, and one of the tools just released some updates so this is fairly timely. This is not how to use the catalog to see if…

It's engrossing, like an old map.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

It is truly an incredible find. If you had just posted the reference, I would have thought the 1885 date was mistyped from 1985. The downward slope to indicate degeneration is a nice touch.

You bought yourself a copy? A facsimile?

Actually, the quality of the foldout in the scan is almost as good as that of your scan. In general, I'm amazed at how they managed to get that file down to 5.2 MB. I suppose all sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magicâ¦

By David MarjanoviÄ (not verified) on 30 Apr 2009 #permalink

Actually, the quality of the foldout in the scan is almost as good as that of your scan.


Have you looked at the large version of John's scan, David?


You just go out and buy 1885 texts? If you have a long-term habit of doing this, I really want to see what's on the rest of your bookshelves!

Fantastic find John, its interesting how we can find things in history that are almost modern, and then there are these other touches. Ever read Kepler's Correspondence with Galileo? Kepler sounds like a lunatic in some sections.

David is right - if you download the PDF the image is high quality. I saw only another version without the good foldout.

I apologise unreservedly to David; I didnât even realise that the text is downloadable and in the version posted on the website the diagram at the back of the book is unreadable.