Gallup: Public Approval of NASA Remains High

i-6fabf3a3779f50b229518c56c8e5c1ba-NASAJOB.gif

Gallup has released its latest tracking data on American views of NASA. As Gallup describes, according to the Sept. 14-16 poll, 56% of Americans rate the job NASA is doing in positive terms, with 16% saying it is doing an "excellent" job and 40% a "good" job. Meanwhile, just 8% say it is doing a poor job, with most of the rest describing NASA's performance as "only fair."

According to Gallup, NASA has had less-than-majority positive evaluations just twice since 1990, when Gallup first asked this question. The initial 46% rating in July 1990 came shortly after a flaw in the Hubble telescope was discovered. Gallup measured the historical low rating of 43% in September 1993 after a series of mishaps, which included the loss of contact with the Mars Orbiter and a couple of last-second decisions to scrub planned space shuttle missions.

The high point in NASA's ratings came in November 1998, shortly after Sen. John Glenn -- one of the earliest U.S. astronauts -- made a much-heralded return trip to space.

Tags

More like this

Never be limited by other people's limited imaginations...If you adopt their attitudes, then the possibility won't exist because you'll have already shut it out ... You can hear other people's wisdom, but you've got to re-evaluate the world for yourself. -Mae Jemison, first African-American woman…
As threatened in passing yesterday, I dug up some old posts on space policy, and will re-post them here. This first one dates from January of 2004, around the time that Bush first floated the idea of the new Moon-and-Mars plan that's re-shaping NASA. The original post has a ton of links in it, and…
A lot of people think the debate was pretty even. Obama supporters liked Obama, McCain supporters liked McCain, I assume (that is utterly obvious). But what matters is the effect on uncommitted voters. Aside from the effects of the three major gaffs that McCain made (the cost to him, to his…
Inside Higher Ed describes a study of complete rates for PhD students broken down by race/ethnicity, gender, whether the student is international or domestic, and by discipline. Here is the key chart: Cumulative Completion Rates for Students Starting Ph.D. Programs, 1992-3 Through 1994-5 Group…

Even more telling would be what measures the public is using to assess NASA. Which I guess you are attempting to infer from the timeline of events. I suspect that most people would be caught off guard with such a question. "I'm supposed to have an opinion on how good a job NASA is doing?!"

I mainly find it interesting here that the public approves of NASA by tens of points more than they approve of, say, Congress, or the President, or the Iraq War, but these things are all getting money and NASA is not.

Incidentally, if you have any control over this: this post is currently in rotation as one of the top-of-the-page scienceblogs plugs, but the title there is given as "Gallop: Public Approval of NASA Remains High". Giddy-yup!