Danish Science Journalism Meeting to Focus on Framing

In the U.S., there is often the false assumption that Europeans are somehow more engaged and supportive of science than Americans. Yet, as I discuss in several studies and as I have written about in articles, instead of science literacy, the same generalizable interaction between values, social identity, and media portrayals drive European perceptions of science debates. Indeed, cross-national survey studies show that while science remains the most widely admired and respected institution in American society, Europeans are far more ambivalent about the costs, risks, and benefits of science than their American counterparts.

In June, I will be traveling to Copenhagen, Denmark to speak at the annual conference of the Danish Association of Science Journalists. The focus of this year's conference is "framing research." Specifically, how to use an understanding of framing and other aspects of science communication research to more effectively engage Danish publics.

In the YouTube video above hosted at the preliminary conference Web site, journalists ask Danish twenty-somethings to recall the most recent news report they read, heard, or watched about science. The results are not surprising and are consistent with what I have written about regarding the miserly nature of audiences in a media world full of competing content choices.

More like this

Matthew Nisbet says maybe, but not by much. I n the U.S., there is often the false assumption that Europeans are somehow more engaged and supportive of science than Americans. Yet, as I discuss in several studies and as I have written about in articles, instead of science literacy, the same…
I am back from an excellent science journalism conference in Denmark and will have more to say on the meeting which highlighted several issues that speak directly to challenges faced here in the US. But for now, I wanted to return to our Commentary article "Science Communication Re-Considered"…
Readers of FRAMING SCIENCE who work in downtown DC or on Capitol Hill may want to take an extended lunch break tomorrow to check out this American Meteorological Society briefing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, Rm. 106, featuring one of your favorite bloggers. ;-) The Divide between…
Somewhat predictably, several pundits and commentators have framed Thursday's Pew survey as supporting an all too common yet misleading "fall from grace" narrative about the place of science in society. These interpretations proclaim a "growing disconnect," "a dangerous divide," a "widening gulf"…

But it's important to keep in mind, that it's difficult for "streeters" to answer open-ended questions that require specific memory. I understand the want/need to leave questions open-ended like that...however, if the video editors had interspersed questions like "What was the last science research you remember reading?" with "What recent general news story do you remember reading/watching?" we'd have a much more thorough idea of what content is actually making it through to long term memory storage.

(or more pointed questions, requiring an opinion that is then backed by content they read/watched somewhere, may have gotten a more accurate picture, like "What do you think are the causes of climate change?" vs "What movies were nominated for Oscars this year?")

From someone who does a lot of man-on-the-street, it's important to make sure the answers are not giving the wrong impression of actual knowledge. But you already know this well, from research surveys.

thanks.

By Christie Nicholson (not verified) on 06 Mar 2009 #permalink