At The Three Cultures Summit on Climate Change, What Scientists Want to Learn From Social Scientists

i-17afddaa3898e82fa0eddf8fd5ce9a03-ColumbiaRiver.jpg

I'm spending the weekend in Oregon at an outpost on the edge of the Columbia River Valley. I'm in town for a unique three cultures summit on climate change, a workshop that brings together scientists, social scientists, philosophers, poets, and artists to discuss strategies and methods for public engagement and communication.

This afternoon we broke into separate disciplinary groups and embarked on a short hike to reflect on what we would like to learn from the other disciplines. When we returned, I jotted down the following notes on what scientists said they would most like to learn or know from social scientists. Here's what they said:

Practical specific applications of framing

Data on different values of different segments of society regarding climate change

How to get policy makers to listen.

Establish an ongoing formal dialogue and partnership with social scientists on sustainability and science.

How to listen effectively given a diversity of social values (communication should be a 2 way street)

Guidance on where to best target our efforts i.e. which segments of the public?

How to communicate through social networks

Help with understanding the practical limits of effective advocacy.

Studies of the culture of science.

More like this

The December 2009 edition of the Journal of Science Communication is now online with some intriguing articles - all Open Access so you can download all the PDFs and read: Control societies and the crisis of science journalism: In a brief text written in 1990, Gilles Deleuze took his friend Michel…
Among the different professional categories, scientists and engineers remain very highly respected by the public, at least compared to politicians, business leaders, the media, and even religious authorities. Part of this is due to the fact that success in the scientific enterprise depends on…
Over the last decade or so, hard rock geologists have done rather poorly in science, because they have become unfashionable, and are overshadowed by the popularity of climate change. Some of them become bitter and twisted and prominent septics. Which brings me on to Copenhagen Congress: why the…
The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline'09 back in January. Today, I asked Bjoern Brembs to answer a…

Good post, had never heard of three summit conferences before. sounds like my cup of tea, marrying art and poety and science and PR.....wow. Can I submit my polar cities idea to them for next year consideration?

DANNY in Taiwan

Does "Studies of the culture of science" mean studies internal to science (Latour, Knorr Cetina, Atkinson) or studies of science in culture generally (Nelkin, Gregory & Miller, Wynne), or both, or either, or...?

The summit sounds fascinating and I look forward to reading more about it.

By Rhetorician (not verified) on 07 Mar 2009 #permalink

Wonderful! Do you have any tips, or did the conference provide any tips for channels through which such information might be provided to the people who want it? I'm doing work that relates specifically to some of those questions. Would be happy to find good outlets for the results.

`How to get policy makers to listen.`

This may be the hardest problem of all, especially when it comes to problems that will not fully emerge until long after today`s politicians are out of office.