The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | M - Th 11p / 10c | |||
Tom Hanks | ||||
|
Blockbuster movies, The Daily Show: As I discuss in forthcoming articles, these are the new tools for "going broad" and motivating interest among mass audiences on issues related to science and society. Watch Tom Hanks above have fun and talk some of the implications of Angels and Demons. You can fret over the accuracy of Hanks' banter when it comes to anti-matter, but some portion of the Daily Show audience and the audience for the blockbuster movie are going to come away doing google searches and motivated to learn more. In so doing, they will find quality sources of information.
Hat tip to Greg Laden.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I'm a little surprised that I haven't seen bloggers commenting on Tom Hanks's appearance on The Daily Show, in which he talks about CERN:
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Tom Hanks
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor…
ouch
Daily Show takes on ASU Commencement
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Arizona State Snubs Obama
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor
classic
cruel but classic
Tom Hanks interview on antimatter later in the show is also…
This is very funny (as you might expect). Chad Orzel posted it because of the references to CERN's super duper collider. (Go see Chad's commentary.)
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Tom Hanks
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor…
Elizabeth Warren on the Daily Show
I think she was about to curse...
ok, so this was some time ago, I'm behind
question is, why don't prime time news shows do interviews like this?
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Elizabeth Warren Pt. 1
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show…
I don't want to hear Tom Hanks talk about physics any more than I want to hear Jenny McCarthy talk about vaccines. I would, however, listen to legendary Queen guitarist Brian May talk about physics. It doesn't matter that he is a geat musician. It does matter that 36 years after starting his thesis, he went back and finished a doctorate.
Tom Hank's Hollywood stardom gives him an audience. It does not give him any credibility on any subject other than acting. We should not buy into the trap of granting celebrity status a privilege it does not deserve, even when addressing a topic we support.
I think that it is great that the public can see that someone whom they know and like for other reasons is also interested in science. I think that people generally should, and in most cases will, carefully consider the source. I agree with Matthew Nisbet that many will be motivated to learn more, and thus find some of the quality sources of information online
I also believe that the scientific community would be wise to monitor these sorts of situations and be prepared to jump into refute any misstatements that might be made. Perhaps, assuming this program was well accepted by the Colbert audience, it might serve as an opening for a professional physicist to appear on the show to give a "real scientist" perspective.
If we want to increase scientific literacy, we need to encourage discussion and debate, and thus expect that misstatements will occur and clarifications will need to be made as a part of that discussion process.
If we adopt an attitude that only people with PhD's should be qualified to talk about science we will only fan the flames of anti-intellectualism and ensure that science is only a fringe activity.
But what would I know? I only have a Master's degree.
Note: I think I do usually know how to distinguish Jon Stewart from Stephen Colbert, but apparently not always.