Genes don't "make" you be a certain way....

Apropos of my earlier post relating to heritability...this is the sort of confusing gibberish that ends up making it into the press, Professor researches genetics of gambling. He tries to clear up problems of communication:

This quote has been misconstrued. In the logical development of any investigation of the genetics of a disorder, once something is shown to run in families and appears to have some heritable component, molecular genetic approaches follow. Studies can be done with small numbers of DNA samples, as I propose doing, but definitive studies require thousands of DNA samples. I doubt such an ambitious undertaking will take place for many years.

Good luck on getting nuance across to the press. All the while, genetic association studies will continue.

Tags

More like this

Purcell et al. (2009). Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder Nature DOI: 10.1038/nature08185 Neil Walker has been doing a spectacular job of serving up useful information in the comments recently, so I asked him to write the first ever guest post on…
The genome-wide association study has been the technique du jour in human genetics for much of the last two years. It's a pure brute force approach, surveying up to a million sites of common variation throughout the genomes of thousands of people at a time, some of whom suffer from a particular…
Well, it's a little late, but I finally have a list of what I see as some of the major trends that will play out in the human genomics field in 2009 - both in terms of research outcomes, and shifts in the rapidly-evolving consumer genomics industry. For genetics-savvy readers a lot of these…
Imagine that there is a trait observed among people that seems to occur more frequently in some families and not others. One might suspect that the trait is inherited genetically. Imagine researchers looking for the genetic underpinning of this trait and at first, not finding it. What might you…

The fact is that we all must engage in risky behavior at one time or another.

Having sex is risky business, as is entering a relationship.

Moreover, males are more prone to engaging in risky behavior.

What appears to be happening here is that some individuals are less able to appreciate the downside of certain risks, perhaps for genetic reasons.

I would guess that being male is a risk factor, and that it is negatively correlated with IQ :-)

In that case, women could help to reduce the incidence of this problem by choosing more intelligent ... oh, yeah.

By Richard Sharpe (not verified) on 28 Mar 2006 #permalink