1. gnxp
  2. Three cheers for Jim Crow!

Three cheers for Jim Crow!

By razib on April 16, 2006.

Below I mentioned the doyen of living population geneticists, James Crow, yeah, Jim Crow. Collaborater with Motoo Kimura of Neutral Theory fame, Crow is still an active member of the biological community. Recently he reviewed Genes in Conflict : The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements by Bob Trivers & Austin Burt in Nature. He begins:

In the early 1970s, Robert Trivers published six articles on the evolution of social behaviour. They were ignored by most social scientists, who were reluctant to consider natural selection as a cause of human behavioural traits, and they were bitterly attacked by marxists for reasons of doctrine. Some population geneticists also objected, because Trivers did not formulate his concepts as standard equations for changes in allele frequency. Yet the papers have proved seminal, and Trivers is now recognized, along with Edward O. Wilson and Bill Hamilton, as one of the founders of behavioural evolution and sociobiology....

Just over ten years ago, Trivers joined forces with geneticist Austin Burt for a detailed study of selfish genetic elements, and Genes in Conflict is the result of their fruitful collaboration. The book is the first of its kind and admirably fills an empty niche.

Crow notes that Burt and Trivers reject the contention that selfish genetic elements might be adaptive. If you want to know why the authors might express this opinion, read the Wikipedia entry on intragenomic conflict.

Tags
genetics

More like this

The two Wilsons on sociobiology
It's not often I get to comment on as-yet-unpublished work, but I have been sent a copy of a forthcoming essay by David Sloan Wilson and Edward O. Wilson, two giants of the theoretical evolutionary field, defending and redefining the nature of sociobiology (Wilson and Wilson 2007). As I have…
Sociobiology 2: Theoretical foundations
Wilson and Wilson begin by reviewing the reasons why sociobiology of the 1970s was rejected. They focus on the arguments against group selection. Levels of selection In the period in which sociobiology was first proposed under that label (from now on, the term sociobiology refers to this…
The Evolutionary Context of Genomic Imprinting
The conventional Mendelian model for diploid organisms assumes that the expression of an autosomal allele within an individual should be invariant of its sex of origin, that is, whether it is inherited from the father or the mother.  This model is incorrect for a subset of alleles across many taxa…
The history of evolutionary genetics
The first chapter of Evolutionary Genetics: Concepts & Case Studies gives a quick sketch of the arc of the field that the book covers via exposition of topical and current issues. Michael R. Dietrich focuses on the series of controversies which serve as "hinges of history." I have addressed…

Wow, thanks, Razib, for linking to Amazon.com for the *Genes in Conflict*. I don't buy or read many books, but this one has me tempted. Btw, that first reviewer left an interesting bunch of questions(from the book)

Steve Flinn, very nice stuff in that pdf. I think i remember seeing ID'ers use Shannon's Information theory in their arguments too. But don't mind them.

Thanks Boknekht for your nice comment. And yes -- I am mindful that when one uses terms such as "communication" and "message" in regard to explaining the underpinnings of evolution, these purely mathematical-based terms can be distorted into the most fantastic of supernatural stories about the origins of life . . .