The paper that was supposed to be out nearly a week ago is finally on the PNAS site. This isn't the first time this has cropped up. Additionally, I can't believe that someone is writing all the press releases which give early dates for release on the website, rather, I'm assuming that the IT guys at PNAS are lazy. Anyway, I don't want to be a bitch, but this is a pattern so I figure I should note it publically (hey, when you waste 15-20 minutes combing the website for a paper multiple times, resentment builds up).
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Drum responds to a discussion of land use in the era of expensive oil by commenting:
A focus on increased density is going to mean a funny political switcheroo for a lot of liberals. We're mostly accustomed to fighting evil corporations on behalf of the little guy, but it turns out that most…
Nick Barnes has an excellent opinion piece in Nature. And the comments are good too. There is a comment-on-the-piece by Anthony Fejes which I think is less good: too much like the kind of people who put you off cycling by insisting you have to wear a cycle helmet or walk. And you should read Nick's…
Busy week here, as Eric attempts to wind up his online teaching class, my parents descend for a week of family projects and fair going, and we deal with the daily realities of a rapidly-onrushing fall, complicated (happily) by a long trip and an early Jewish holiday season. So I give you something…
... that scientists are not historians, as John Wilkins points out. (Blake has also written a good post on this topic.) It is easy (and even preferable) to clearly distinguish the good guys from the bad guys, and sweeping generalizations about old ideas are often included to give clout to modern…
Wow! it's almost like they owe you.
I think the PNAS site is really hard to navigate. A friend of mine accidentally linked to a 2000 paper on TB genes thinking it was the latest!