Michael Lynch on non-adaptive evolution

Michael Lynch in Nature Reviews Genetics, The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes:

Although numerous investigators assume that the global features of genetic networks are moulded by natural selection, there has been no formal demonstration of the adaptive origin of any genetic network. This Analysis shows that many of the qualitative features of known transcriptional networks can arise readily through the non-adaptive processes of genetic drift, mutation and recombination, raising questions about whether natural selection is necessary or even sufficient for the origin of many aspects of gene-network topologies. The widespread reliance on computational procedures that are devoid of population-genetic details to generate hypotheses for the evolution of network configurations seems to be unjustified.

A richer exposition of the author's ideas can be found in The Origins of Genome Architecture. An early paper which shows the seeds of his thinking can be found over at Genetics, Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations , while The origins of eukaryotic gene structure is a more recent piece. Both are now open access. Lynch has strong opinions, for example, see this volley launched against Sean Carroll (of evo-devo fame).

Tags

More like this

This is another addition to my αEP series about evolutionary psychology. Here's the first, and unfortunately there are several more to come. By the way, people are wondering about the α in the title. Don't you people do any immunology? α is standard shorthand for "anti". I mentioned in the last…
I thought I had come to grips with evo-devo. Then along come Hopi Hoekstra and Jerry Coyne to call shenanigans on Sean Carroll's model of evo-devo. This is nothing new for Coyne, but I can't recall Hoekstra ever getting involved in the debate before now. Before we get to Hoekstra and Coyne, let's…
John Hawks & Daniel MacArthur have already pointed to a new paper in Genome Research, Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. As Dan notes, it's Open Access, so you can read the PDF yourself. That being said, "Just read it!" might be somewhat a tall…
People who don't understand modern evolutionary theory shouldn't be writing books criticizing evolutionary theory. That sounds like rather pedestrian and obvious advice, but it's astonishing how often it's ignored — the entire creationist book publishing industry demands a steady supply of…

Thanks, I'm definitely going to have a look at this. And then puzzle over half-remembered terms from under-grad and pull out the textbooks...