I was curious about a few social variables which often associate across generations, and also within families. So I looked in the General Social Survey for denomination, highest degree and socioeconomic index, which I knew were surveyed for the individual (respondent), their parents and their spouse. Below the fold are the correlation matrices generated. Remember that if you assume a linear dependency you square the correlation (e.g., 0.50 → 0.25) to find out how much of the variation in X can be accounted for by variation in Y.
Religious denomination | Denomination | Father's Denom. | Mother's Denom. | Denom. Raised | Spouse Denom. | Spouse Denom. Raised |
Denomination | - | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.48 |
Father's Denom. | - | - | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.47 | 0.40 |
Mother's Denom. | - | - | - | 0.87 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
Denom. Raised | - | - | - | - | 0.48 | 0.42 |
Spouse Denom. | - | - | - | - | 0.67 | |
Spouse Denom. Raised | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Highest level of education | Degree | Father's Degree | Mother's Degree | Spouse Degree |
Degree | - | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.57 |
Father's Degree | - | - | 0.57 | 0.37 |
Mother's Degree | - | - | - | 0.35 |
Spouse Degree | - | - | - | - |
Socioeconomic index | SEI | Father's SEI | Mother's SEI | Spouse SEI |
SEI | - | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.33 |
Father's SEI | - | - | 0.38 | 0.22 |
Mother's SEI | - | - | - | 0.20 |
Spouse SEI | - | - | - | - |
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Greg Booth said:
A 1976 study put guns in 40% of Canadian households.
An Angus Reid poll in 1991 put the number at 23%.
The 1989 International Crime Survey gave 29%
From Phil Ronzone's rkba.002 (US rates converted to rate per 100,000)
from U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the…
We've been around on this before, and all it does is impress me with
the predilection of some pro-gun folks for self-delusion on this
topic. (I'm sorry if that sounds harsh, but it seems to me that many
people suspend their powers of reason on this issue.)
Here are the NSW homicide rates from 1910…
One of the major problems in most societies, subject to "great sorts" of various kinds, is the fact that people observe correlations of attitudes & beliefs, and infer from those necessary relations. For example, if one of the first things that someone finds out about me is that I am an atheist…
The World Values Survey has a question about immigration policy with four options:
- Let anyone come
- As long as jobs available
- Strict limits
- Prohibit people from coming
I used WVS 2005-2008 from 57 countries first. Then I filled out the countries with the
Four-wave Aggregate of the Values…
This seems restricted to a specific foreign country, therefore is it really useful to anyone other than those in that particular country?
This is very interesting indeed - and the opposite to what most people would predict - because people 'choose' (or at least they *think* they choose) their denomination but not their SES.
If you looked at adopted children, denomination would be about the same, while SES would be 0.