Breeding the future

Some results from the GSS on what people perceive the ideal number of children is based on social variables. Additionally, the realized number of children the respondent has. I limited the sample to whites who were 40 or older (there are people who have children past 40, but I assume that most of the discrepancy, or not, between ideal and realized will be evident by that age).














More like this

In my post yesterday where I compared Catholics & Protestants in New England with Southerners in the McCain Belt, I was struck on the evolution question that in New England Protestants exhibited much more variance than Catholics. More Protestants rejected evolution or definitely believed it…
In my post below responding to David Goldstein's implication that intelligence has been subject to strong directional selection I put up a chart from the GSS which illustrated the fact that women who have weaker vocabularies tend to have more children. If you don't believe that intelligence "means…
One "urban legend" which is in common circulation among my friends is that liberals are smarter than conservatives. From my own personal experience this seems plausible, and I doubt I'm the only one as evidenced by the furious speed at which the "Bush voting states have lower IQs" meme spread…
My post below elicited a lot of response. One thing to point out though, which I want to emphasize: a higher proportion of smart people go to college now than in the past. How can this be? First, let's review the change in distributions of intelligence of those with college degrees (or higher) and…

That's great - thanks for this.

Seems like almost nobody _wants_ to have zero children - tho' about 25 percent of US women college grads end-up this way.

Also seems that two is the ideal family size - which makes sense from the perspective of parental happiness but does not replace the population.
Because nowadays (for smart and well organized people with access to fertility technologies) 'ideal' family size looks as if it means the the same as 'maximum' family size.

I know you love data density, but those images are a bit too small.

A visualization of statistics question: are the income graphs the right thing to display, or should they be smoothed (or bucketed) first?

I'm sure that a smoothed version would be more pleasant, but would it make extracting information easier? and would it be worth the data thrown out?

By Douglas Knight (not verified) on 31 Jul 2008 #permalink

Interesting, thanks.
And for the image size, firefox users can press "ctrl and +" .