1. gnxp
  2. Republicans healthier than Democrats?

Republicans healthier than Democrats?

By razib on March 11, 2009.

No surprise that a reader points out that healthier areas seem to map onto "Blue" areas of the United States. But there is actually more to this than meets the eye: Are Republicans Healthier Than Democrats?:

In the International Journal of Epidemiology, S. V. Subramanian and Jessica Perkins write that, after controlling for age, sex, race, marital status, religious service attendance, highest educational degree, and total family income, Republicans were 25% less likely than Democrats to report being in poor health. They find a key component of this to be smoking: after controlling for that above list of variables, Republicans were 15% less likely to be smokers.

Remember that though Democratic areas tend to be wealthier, the wealthier individuals within Democratic regions tend to be more Republican.

Tags
Politics

More like this

Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do
If there is one "politics" book you should read this year, it is Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Now, this sort of acclamation does need to be tempered by the fact that I myself don't really read "political" books very often. But despite the…
How Does Income Affect Voting? It Depends On Where You Are
Since I posted on a really bad study that's outside of my area of expertise the other day, I thought I should make it up to you by posting on what I think is a good study by Gelman et al. that's also outside of my area of expertise today. Plus, with a title like "Rich state, poor state, red state,…
Is "Dumb Jock" an accurate stereotype?
When Jim and Nora talk about the social groups in their school, they matter-of-factly categorize almost every fellow student into stereotyped pigeonholes. There are the nerds, the rockers, the cools, the goths, and of course, the jocks. The assumption, naturally, is that none of these groups…
Quoth Vox Day: Antivaxers are more educated. Quoth the study Vox cites: Not exactly...
Vaccines and the antivaccine movement were in the news a lot in 2015. The year started out with a huge measles outbreak originating at Disneyland over the holidays last year and dominated news coverage in the early months of 2015. This outbreak had enormous consequences. It galvanized public…

If you view Republicans as a bunch of Church going moralists, lower smoking rates make sense; if you view Republicans as a bunch of greedy fat cats who love corporations it doesn't.

Also, did they control for alcohol consumption?

Nicotine tends to moderate neurosis, and most smokers are more inherently neurotic individuals. We know that "liberals" tend to have more anxiety and unhappiness due to being upset about perceived social and economic injustices, so it follows that "liberals" would be more neurotic, and therefore more likely to smoke.

By David Nystrom (not verified) on 12 Mar 2009 #permalink

Y'know, when I put this together with a recent post of Peter Frost's I realized that Greg Cochran's gay germ theory could explain a lot more than homosexuality. I think if there is such a pathogen it could also be responsible for many more social changes, even the increase in the proportion of bands which write their own songs. Here's the long explanation:

http://www.corrupt.org/columns/martin_regnen/the_pathogen_theory_of_pro…

I don't know if there's some big hole in that theory that I didn't see, but it's more plausible than Agnostic's genius germs, isn't it?