1. mikethemadbiologist
  2. Some Slogans for the Congressional Democrats

Some Slogans for the Congressional Democrats

By mikethemadbiologist on July 6, 2007.

Over at Hullabaloo, I found this great list of suggested slogans for congressional Democrats:

Congressional Democrats:
"We'd stand up for you, but it didn't focus group well."

Congressional Democrats:
"We'd stand up for you, but they'd call us bad names."

Congressional Democrats:
"If we won't stand up to Bush, what makes you think we'd ever stand up for you?"

Congressional Democrats:
"If we won't stand up for the Constitution, what makes you think we'd ever stand up for you?"

Congressional Democrats:
"Sure we're cowards, but you don't have any other choice."

Congressional Democrats:
"We promise to fight for you next time."

Congressional Democrats:
"Please, don't hurt us!"

Congressional Democrats:
"We'd stand up for you, but our consultant didn't think it was a good idea."

Congressional Democrats:
"We'd stand up for you, but you'll vote for us even if we don't so it's not worth our time"

Congressional Democrats:
"We take your votes for granted."

If they can't go after a president with a 28% approval rating, whom can they go after? Pathetic.

Tags
Democrats
Ninnies

More like this

It's Called "Political Cover"
Jason Rosenhouse thinks that PZ, Ed Brayton, Revere, and I have reached a "strange conclusion" about the recent Democratic cave-in on wiretapping. It doesn't make sense, at least to him, that we'd blame the Democrats, given that 80% of the Democrats in Congress didn't vote for the wiretapping bill…
Bush Obstructs Justice...
...and are you in any way, shape, or form surprised? Has anything in the last six years suggested to anyone in the Coalition of the Sane that the Bush/Cheney Administration has any sense of shame or propriety? Of course not. It should be clear that this administration will do anything and…
Acknowledging Obama's failures
It looks like there's going to be some kind of health care reform bill, but we're not celebrating. It's legislation that could have been important and meaningful and instead is a neutered industry-friendly cup of weak tea with a Draconian anti-choice amendment. That Obama would disappoint us is no…
Bush Backing Away from Anti-Gay Amendment
Another part of Bush's interview with the Washington Post the other day that was fascinating was this exchange on the Federal Marriage Amendment: The Post: Do you plan to expend any political capital to aggressively lobby senators for a gay marriage amendment? THE PRESIDENT: You know, I think…

News item: "107 New Secret Service Agents to be Hired to Protect Bush Once he Leaves Office".

My question: Do we really need that many new prison guards?

By natural cynic (not verified) on 06 Jul 2007 #permalink

Ridger -

I think that at the least they should be using their power of subpoena to seriously investigate this adminstration. They don't need to override vetos, all they need is majority and will.

That being said, I don't know why anyone thought that the country would magically change with the turn over of power in the House and Senate. Once we get the presidency, then things will start moving.