Error in the age of personal genomics

i-6f50481394aa2d1f18bd08118085b733-danielx.png

Over at Genetic Future Dr. Daniel MacArthur points out some errors in deCODE's interpretation services. Dr. MacArthur presumably knows his maternity, though if the X chromosome results were correct one would guess that Dr. MacArthur is actually adopted and that his mother might be a Lumbee Indian.

But it makes me wonder how confused people are going to be due to problems with false results. In particular, as these technologies become very cheap many families with make recourse to them. Sometimes this will highlight "extrapair paternity events," but sometimes there will be errors and siblings may face a period of uncertainty in relation to possibly discordant results. The likelihood of a false result creating an unexpected situation is conditional on various probabilities, the error rate of the results, and the likelihood of an extrapair paternity event (which varies from demographic to demographic and family to family). I guess we'll have more data in the near future....

More like this

Now that we've apparently elected Nate Silver the President of Science, this is some predictable grumbling about whether he's been overhyped. If you've somehow missed the whole thing, Jennifer Ouellette offers an excellent summary of the FiveThirtyEight saga, with lots of links, but the Inigo…
After yesterdays post about the sloppy probability from ann coulter's chat site, I thought it would be good to bring back one of the earliest posts on Good Math/Bad Math back when it was on blogger. As usual with reposts, I've revised it somewhat, but the basic meat of it is still the same…
Newsweek has an entertaining story which highlights the recent penetration of science into the venerable enterprise of genealogy. The good: ...Adopted at birth, Royer knew nothing about her biological parents. But certain physical traits-wide nose, dark skin-led people to guess that she was…
I commented on the "throwback family" a few days ago, well, The Times (of London) has two articles which reduce the likelihood of this being a hoax in my mind. It seems clear that there is a family, highly inbred, which lives in Turkey where a number of the children walk on all fours and exhibit…

Raz,

Well DecodeMe seems to have been working with an older 23AndMe data set, so that's how they account for the error - which is now fixed.

In either case, I too uploaded my 23AndMe results to DecodeMe, and find that both my Autosomal and X Chromosome have:
1% African
5% East Asian

This is a welcome finding for me - as 23AndMe told me I was 100% European - when I have pigmentation results that suggest Uralic admixture, have ABO blood type B - common in Central Asia - and a family history going back to Lancashire, England to the exact area where the Romans settled 5,500 Alano-Sarmatians - who hailed from the Ukrainian/Hungarian plains, but originated further East.

I also welcome the 1% African, and have a very good idea where those genes express ;)

BTW, I have a section of "High Sharing", in the exact same spot on the X chromosome, with both Craig Venter and Kari Stefansson - though no high sharing with James Watson, the 3rd of the celebrity individuals listed by DecodeMe.

"Alano-Sarmatians": have you heard the theory that the Dragon Banner of Wales originates with these coves?

By bioIgnoramus (not verified) on 23 Dec 2009 #permalink