Disqus and Echo

I'm starting to see Disqus and Echo all over the web. Anyone else notice this? I wasn't happy when I had to move Gene Expression Classic off Haloscan, so the whole "death of comments" fad isn't something I'm a fan of. But it seems like Facebook's creation of a successful private web is now driving the Facebookification of the public web. The main issue I have with all this revolution of the "discussion" is that in my experience as a blogger most "discussion" is retarded and most discussants are barely sentient.

More like this

A week ago I observed that commenting was being transformed with the spread of Disqus and Echo. The Big Money has now introduced Echo: The comments themselves are also more interactive. Any of your postings can be shared with your friends on Facebook, followers on Twitter, or any of your…
Another student, me, and Bossman discussing some cool data: Another student: Thats so crazy! How could HIV do that?? Me: LOL! Its sentient. Another student: LOL! Its a conscious being with self awareness! Me: LOL! It can recognize itself in a mirror! Another student: LOL! It has critical…
So I was reading this thread on John Quiggin's blog when the discussion turned to Tim Blair's policy of banning any dissenters from commenting on his blog. (See here for an example of the sort of comment that will get you banned.) Now Blair doesn't have to support comments from people that…
In a recent quack conference, Deepak Chopra did his usual thing: taking new science that he understands poorly and stuffing it full of magic bogosity. According to Chopra, that pesky inflamed microbiome is sentient. The genome, microbiome and epigenome, which the author collectively calls the “…

Most discussion in blog comments is pretty uninteresting, yeah. But that's why you try to read interesting blogs with more than just barely sentient commenters...

(An interesting coincidence is that Friendly Atheist switched to Disqus recently; and being the first blog that I regularly visit to do so, I had to try it, but things were just broken. He/they seem to have switched back now.)

There are probably ways to improve commenting, but nobody seems to have done it right yet. Lots of people seem to know how to build features for commenters and blog owners (spam filter, rich text editor, ...) but how do you build communities?

Brutal but true.

And love your work here Razib, don't change anything.

By emblazoned (not verified) on 09 Mar 2010 #permalink

Razib says: "The main issue I have with all this revolution of the "discussion" is that in my experience as a blogger most "discussion" is retarded and most discussants are barely sentient."

Savor it. Blog comments are a uniquely clear view into human nature with millions of new examples every day to consider. As a blogger with readers you can set up experiments. As commenters, we can too, albeit with less control.

For example, consider the possibility that (lack of) sentience is not the trait you are observing - but rather the power of emotionally potent beliefs they hold that have been publicly called into question. This can cause discussants who hold those beliefs as part of their emotional identity, to defend them however they can. If successful - they finding a surge of dopamine as a reward. If not, then, perhaps some adrenaline to fuel the next comment.

I suspect that even the most retarded comments are often made by relatively intelligent persons who have allowed their brains to become infected with beliefs that have little connection to reality - which they must defend or face depression. It takes a very clever mind to attempt to justify some of the concepts floating about the Interwebs.

It seems to me just the effort of ideological combat must provide some relief for them because they are often spectacularly unsuccessful. But then, in such cases, their brains will tell them that they did a wonderful job anyway.

The really interesting part of all this is that it seems evident that defending an ideological belief must feel just like "critical thinking" to someone engaged in it. And so, the interesting question arises: how does one know when they are seeking objectivity or simply defending an irrational belief already firmly attached to their belief system? I find it all fascinating.

By Ray in Seattle (not verified) on 09 Mar 2010 #permalink

But aren't cats just adorable?

By bioIgnoramus (not verified) on 09 Mar 2010 #permalink

Razib,way off topic, but are you going to post breakdowns on the SECULAR RIGHT survey anytime soon? E.g., how many of the Hispanics are Catholic, what the mix is in the mixed race catagory, how many of the females are atheists, how do the Hispanics define their race, what is the average age of the "know there is no God" catagory, etc.?