Weblog awards

The 2006 Weblog Awards

So, Goodmath/Badmath was nominated for a weblog award for the best science blog. I was actually planning on ignoring it for two reasons. First, Pharyngula was nominated in the same category, and there is absolutely no way that I can *hope* to complete with PZ. And second, the Weblogs are kind of goofy, with very strange voting rules (for example, you're allowed to vote once per day).

But people keep emailing me and asking why I haven't said anything. So, if you feel like voting for this
blog, please do. Maybe I'll manage to come in third or fourth :-)

And many thanks to the folks who nominated me. It's really nice to know that people have such a positive opinion of my blog. It's incredibly flattering to be nominated alongside people like PZ and Phil.

Tags

More like this

Last year, 3 Quarks Daily had a science blogging contest that shelled out some nice cash to the Top Quark. Well, they're at it again!
The fantastic blog 3 Quarks Daily has opened up nominations for its second annual prize in science blogging. This year, the contest will be judged by the great Richard Dawkins, and there will be three winners.
This is what you need to do: 2008 Nominations Contact Form In order to nominate blogs for the 2008 Edublog Awards you have to link to them first!

Congrats on your nomination.

Say, I wonder if you'd like to comment on the math behind the Unsuggester over at LibraryThing. It's claiming to show you the book you're least likely to own if you own a given book, but it seems to be showing you the book you most conspicuously don't own (i.e. the most popular book you don't own).

http://www.librarything.com/unsuggester

I would vote for all three of you at least once (in fact, I think I nominated GM/BM when they called for inputs), but their Flash thingy doesn't work in my browser. Why they need to use Flash to get the choice of one option button is beyond me.

Why so negative, Mark?
Your blog rocks the most, among us to say the least:-)