Last year, 3 Quarks Daily had a science blogging contest that shelled out some nice cash to the Top Quark. Well, they're at it again!
You can now stop by and nominate your favorite posts by leaving a comment here. I know there's a lot of great writing going on here at Science Blogs, so look around and nominate something!
If you want to nominate something of mine (which, of course, you do), here are some of my suggestions (nominating more than once doesn't help in any way - so I'll make note of ones already nominated by others):
Evolution: The Curious Case of Dogsnominated!Evolution: Watching Speciation OccurAncient Sex Scandals: Did We Get It On With Neandertals?- Does Domestication Produce Dummies?
- Pan Fried Conservation: How To Eat Our Way To Healthy Reefs
Of course, feel free to nominate any other fav posts of mine from the last year! Stay tuned to hear more about the contest!
UPDATE: Nominations are now closed. Please, go vote for one of my posts!
- Log in to post comments
More like this
As you might have noticed, I've added a new badge to the left sidebar. That's right - you can start submitting posts for next year's Open Laboratory already! So find your favorite science blog posts from around the interwebs that were published in the past couple months and get submitting!
On a…
Alright folks! Thank you to all of you who nominated my posts for the 3 Quarks Daily science blogging prize! The final winners will be chosen by Richard Dawkins, but before he even glances at them, the public gets to narrow the focus down from the 80 entries that made the first cut. Which means, of…
Actually, the awards will include other sorts of blogging, too, but it's the awards for science blogging that have a fast-approaching nomination deadline.
3 Quarks Daily Announces The Quarks: The First Award for Best Science Blogging Judged by Steven Pinker
Celebrating the best of blog-writing on…
The always-fantastic blog 3 Quarks Daily has opened up nominations for its third annual prize in science blogging. This year, the contest will be judged by Lisa Randall, and there will be three winners.
Posts can be nominated by bloggers or readers, and if any of you wanted to nominate one of my…
Agree that: (1) Organic foods do not improve our health vs. conventional, (2) Conventional and GMO is necessary for world populations in many areas, and (3) certified organic is a far cry from what people think it is, though I'm sure you know there are thousands of local organic farmers who don't operate that way. I would be interested to know your take on the organic/conventional difference when it comes to heavy nitrogen use, which is the reason I buy local organic. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/05/the-gulf-of-mexico-has.html