RIP Ed Lorenz

i-d600c0b7a24e0b239cc42c86d4f0fe1c-lorenz-attractor.jpg The man who discovered the "butterfly effect" died this morning at the age of 90.

Ed Lorenz was a meteorologist; I will spare you most of the details of his career, as they can be found in the MIT obituary. But back in the early 60s, when he was trying to figure out why weather prediction was so difficult, he discovered that even a simple set of equations can produce fundamentally unpredictable results (play with this effect here!). Scientists in virtually every field of study have been banging their heads against this fact in utter frustration for the past 45 years.

Quoting from an email Inez Fung sent 'round to the department:

[Lorenz] had published three papers in 2006, and was not sure what he would work on next.
...
Talking about his landmark 1963 paper "Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow", he said he realized that he had discovered something significant the very same night - about weather prediction - he had no clue about the broad impacts of the paper. He also did not know if the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil could set off a tornado in Texas - he had attempted such a calculation, and the results were very sensitive to assumptions about the stability of the atmosphere.

Who wants to start a betting pool on the number of obituaries that will make cheesy jokes about the effects of Lorenz's last breath on global weather patterns and/or butterflies? It seems to be a slow news week so I predict at least two cartoons.

More like this

All the George Will nonsense has had one good result - "The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 89 Iss. 9 " is up at number one in the AMS charts. But there is more of interest in the list if you look further.. 1. The Myth of…
Everyone knows about the "butterfly effect": the idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil could eventually result in the formation of a tornado in Texas by virtue of very small alterations in the initial conditions of a system. Though this description of it is often decried by people…
A male Blue Moon or Great Eggfly butterfly, Hypolimnas bolina. A butterfly-killing bacteria that is only lethal to males has given rise to skewed sex ratios in populations of this species on two islands in the South Pacific, but researchers have found that male butterflies on one island have…
I had no time to read this in detail and write a really decent overview here, perhaps I will do it later, but for now, here are the links and key excerpts from a pair of exciting new papers in PLoS Biology and PLoS ONE, which describe the patterns of expression of a second type of cryptochrome…

I love the Lorenz Attractor ... I had that as my desktop wallpaper for a long time. The James Gleick book "Chaos" does a great job, I think, of talking about Lorenz's work.

Gleick's book is where I was introduced to the Lorenz equations meself (and because of that, I spent the better part of a summer playing on the computer with various transforms of said equations as well).

So far as the cartoons: I'll honestly be surprised if there's more than two (but then, I could be wrong -- it's happened once or twice before [grin]...)

His work is the reason I learned to write computer programs, modeling drive pendulum systems, all because one of my professors had Lorenze butterfly working on a computer in the physics lab. Thank you Ed, for teaching me "Hey, wont it be cool if..."

Just found this - very cool. Thanks!