We don't see this particular creationist argument being made too often these days. I think this may be because it is boring and difficult to frame nicely.
As a result, this video is a little boring, but if you are a true foot soldier in the war against irrationality, you'll sit through it as a good training film.
Good luck.
Compare with this: Talk Origins on Polonium Halos
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Is PZ Myers over the top? Is Phil Plait too nice? Is Chris Mooney right about framing? If I meet a Creationist, should I throw a fossil over his head?
A while back, I did a radio show with a skeptic who happened to be a musician. One of the main topics was whether or not being mean to people…
What I Wish Wikipedia and Others Were Saying About SOPA/PIPA
The blackout and other protests today are the result of a long, sustained, full-court press against legislation that's being pushed through despite widespread opposition. Yet, Lamar Smith and many other members of the U.S. House and…
Today I will be coming back from our little camping trip (hopefully!) Until I get back to my labtop, I'll entertain you with another post on microscopy.
Flipping through Nature, I stumbled onto this commentary: The good, the bad and the ugly. Here's a taste:
To correctly capture images using a…
Let's play the most boring card game in the universe!
Here are the rules. We start with a fully sorted deck of 52 cards, and we deal out four hands. We don't deal in the ordinary way, either: we give the top 13 cards to the first player, then the next 13 to the second, and so forth. (We could also…
oh... why should we even think about about non constant radioactive dedacy rates? Because it would support young earth bull****?
Instant grenade creation. My ass.
I am afraid i could have forgotten something important while watching this video.
My brain hurts.