We don't see this particular creationist argument being made too often these days. I think this may be because it is boring and difficult to frame nicely.
As a result, this video is a little boring, but if you are a true foot soldier in the war against irrationality, you'll sit through it as a good training film.
Good luck.
Compare with this: Talk Origins on Polonium Halos
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Is PZ Myers over the top? Is Phil Plait too nice? Is Chris Mooney right about framing? If I meet a Creationist, should I throw a fossil over his head?
A while back, I did a radio show with a skeptic who happened to be a musician. One of the main topics was whether or not being mean to people…
He lectured on the Cavern of Torquay, the now famous Kent's Cavern. He paced like a Franciscan Preacher up and down behind a long show-case, up two steps, in a room in the old Clarendon. He had in his hand a huge hyena's skull. He suddenly dashed down the steps-- rushed, skull in hand, at the first…
What I Wish Wikipedia and Others Were Saying About SOPA/PIPA
The blackout and other protests today are the result of a long, sustained, full-court press against legislation that's being pushed through despite widespread opposition. Yet, Lamar Smith and many other members of the U.S. House and…
Today I will be coming back from our little camping trip (hopefully!) Until I get back to my labtop, I'll entertain you with another post on microscopy.
Flipping through Nature, I stumbled onto this commentary: The good, the bad and the ugly. Here's a taste:
To correctly capture images using a…
oh... why should we even think about about non constant radioactive dedacy rates? Because it would support young earth bull****?
Instant grenade creation. My ass.
I am afraid i could have forgotten something important while watching this video.
My brain hurts.