Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has said teachers who refuse younger students access to the site are "bad educators".
Speaking at the Online Information conference at London's Olympia, he played down the long-running controversy over the site's authority.
He said young students should be able to reference the online encyclopaedia in their work.
Mr Wales said the site, which is edited by users, should be seen as a "stepping stone" to other sources.
As long as an article included accurate citations, he said he had "no problem" with it being used as a reference for younger students, although academics would "probably be better off doing their own research".
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This is the third in a series of test essays I'm doing to prepare for
my comprehensive exams. The questions for these essays come
from 3 places: ones I've made up based on my readings, ones assigned to
previous doctoral students, and ones my advisor makes up based on my
readings. I'm assuming the…
Now that I'm not scared to look at my responses... This one doesn't look so bad, so I'm sharing. Please do keep in mind that this was written in 2 hours, by a tired person, with tired fingers!
---
Christina K. Pikas
Comps Information Retrieval (Minor)
July 20, 2009
Question F2: Design an…
In his inaugural address, President Obama promised to "restore science to its rightful place." What exactly that place was became a subject of much discussion in the blogs, and we learned more on March 9, 2009, when the President issued a memorandum ordering agency heads to develop policies, under…
On the heels of David Warlick's session on using online tools in the science classroom, this initiative is really exciting:
Teachers, Students, Web Gurus, and Foundations Launch Campaign to Transform Education, Call for Free, Adaptable Learning Materials Online
Cape Town, January 22nd, 2008--A…
so do you have an opinion on this?
Hm. I think Jimbo's starting to drink a bit too much of his own Koolaid.
I've been a Wikipedia contributor for a few years now, and I think quite highly of the project. But I have to disagree with this -- Wikipedia is great for getting quick access to information and as a starting point for research, but a child of any age should be taught that any encyclopedia -- even one as wide-ranging as Wikipedia -- should only be a starting point for one's research, not the beginning and end of it. I made the same mistake when I was in elementary school -- I didn't get in trouble with it, but looking back there was a certain gap in my education that should have been plugged as soon as they started teaching us to do research.
I like Wikipedia; I like it a lot. But to hear this coming from the founder -- someone who ought to know better -- is a little discouraging. Kids develop their habits early, and it's easier to get them going in the right direction to begin with than to break them of bad habits later. (I once wrote the same thing in an Amazon review of Sandra Lee's Semi-Homemade Cooking for Kids. You should the flames I got for that.)
Thanks for the comment. In my view, Wikipedia is neither a primary source, a substitute for a primary source, or a classic secondary source. A well done wikipedia article, well referenced, etc. is pretty much what a student researcher (at any level from middle school through grad school) should have in hand after some time (hours, a day) of preliminary investigation. A good idea of the topic, a good list of references, and so on.
I thin we have to stop seeing wikipedia in relation to classic modalities of research and realize that it has a special, powerful place.
Hey, I should blog this thought...