Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity

I have not read this book, but I'm interested in finding out more about it. Has anyone out there had a shot at it?

i-95d0b06dd2fe529d10e0015468083781-creationism_book.jpg

Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Sather Classical Lectures)

Information from Amazon.com: Review
"Sedley's argument is subtle and expert. . . . The brilliance of this book is that Sedley lets the Greeks talk to us and, surprisingly, we can understand what they're saying."--Nature

Product Description

The world is configured in ways that seem systematically hospitable to life forms, especially the human race. Is this the outcome of divine planning or simply of the laws of physics? Ancient Greeks and Romans famously disagreed on whether the cosmos was the product of design or accident. In this book, David Sedley examines this question and illuminates new historical perspectives on the pantheon of thinkers who laid the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Versions of what we call the "creationist" option were widely favored by the major thinkers of classical antiquity, including Plato, whose ideas on the subject prepared the ground for Aristotle's celebrated teleology. But Aristotle aligned himself with the anti-creationist lobby, whose most militant members--the atomists--sought to show how a world just like ours would form inevitably by sheer accident, given only the infinity of space and matter. This stimulating study explores seven major thinkers and philosophical movements enmeshed in the debate: Anaxagoras, Empedocles, Socrates, Plato, the atomists, Aristotle, and the Stoics.

From the Inside Flap
"David Sedley's treatment of ancient views on intelligent design will transform our current thinking."--Thomas Johansen, author of Plato's Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias

"Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity has the qualities of a classic. Powerfully organised round an enthralling theme, it is singularly rich in execution. The author's unsurpassed command of his material is matched by the clarity, originality, and imaginative detail of his arguments. The book is as accessible as it is authoritative. It speaks to everyone interested in Greek philosophy, and very many of its readers will go back to it again and again."--Sarah Broadie, author of Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics

About the Author
David Sedley is Laurence Professor of Ancient Philosophy at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of many books, including Plato's Cratylus (2003) and The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato's Theaetetus (2004), and is the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy.

Tags
Categories

More like this

A few months ago, I quoted George Sarton's low opinion of Plato's Timaeus. Jonathan Barnes has reviewed David Sedley's Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity and has this to say about Timaeus: Above all, Sedley lauds the Timaeus. It is a 'uniquely rich and seminal text'. It is 'the most…
New: Solutions listed Mike Dunford, who is still trying to get me to pay for that time he put me up in Hawaii when his wife was on active service in Iraq (if I knew what I'd have to pay, both in climbing horrific rainforested slopes to release wallabies, and this meme, I'd never have gone) has…
In an appalling act of bias, Judge Cherie Blair suspended the sentence of a man convicted of assaulting another and breaking his jaw because the assailant was a "religious man". Apparently just being a member of a particular cult is sufficient to get your criminal penalties reduced by a few years…
I haven't done much philosophical blogging lately. There are Reasons. I'm preparing to move to Sydney over the next few months (and there may be a period in which I have no laptop too), and trying to catch up on a bunch of projects I have in play and which deserve my attention. Also, there's a…

That does look interesting...

By afarensis, FCD (not verified) on 16 Jun 2008 #permalink

Thanks for the tip! I will put it on my To Be Read list.

It looks to be interesting, and there's got to be a couple of satisfying moments where's it's pointed out that they knew more an better science and philosophy in the Iron Age than Dembski and the DI know today.

This one is on my list too, but I haven't even purchased it yet. It looks like it might be a good review of some of the ideas that laid the foundations for the current arguments we're embroiled in.

you see, this battle's been ragin'/since Zeus was on the bottle/'tween Science like Democritus/and Faith like Aristotle ...