In a surprising result, most Young Earth Creationists would prefer that Creationism not be taught along side Evolution.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The latest attempt to create sparks over science and religion came on Sunday in the New York Times book review. There, Judith Shulevitz wrote a subtle but ultimately very troubling piece that largely points the finger at scientists themselves for spurring on the evolution conflict. John Rennie goes…
Some people have wondered what happened to Ian Plimer. Before his current anti-science book, didn't he take it to the creationists in Telling Lies for God? Trouble is, Plimer's methods have not changed -- Telling Lies for God has the same cavalier approach to evidence as Heaven and Earth.…
One of my New Year's resolutions is to pay more attention to my blog, so let's kick off the year by considering what showed up in my mailbox today.
Though I have recently been less active on the creationism beat than I have been in the past, I am still on a handful of creationist mailing lists. As…
I'm in the Washington Post's book review blog today, offering my take on a chapter from conservative pundit S.E. Cupp's forthcoming book. I haven't seen anything but the 4th chapter ("Thou Shalt Evolve"), but the book as a whole seems like an odd project. Not least that a book titled Losing Our…
Haha! They want ONLY Creationism taught, not alongside evolution, so their answer is No to that arrangement.
...or it's because PZ already sent the Phyrangulites over there...
*snicker*
Well, at least we know how many people actually went to that website before it got all PZ'ed: 144.