1. gregladen
  2. Pre Columbian Contact Archaeology

Pre Columbian Contact Archaeology

By gregladen on November 14, 2008.

An excellent read: Muslim Sailors, a Skeptical Redux

In a recent issue of Skeptic, Tim Callahan discusses the issue of ancient astronauts and lost civilizations.(1) This is perhaps one of the most frequent and popular theories of pseudo-archaeology, and certainly an area of concern ripe for a skeptical assessment.(2) Overall, Callahan does an admirable job in addressing the common theories of hidden secret civilizations, and it is good to see the inclusion of more recent Raelian ideas, which are generally seen as too off base for archaeologists to even bother discussing them. However, Callahan's discussion of pseudo-archaeology takes a long diversion into another popular area of fictitious history, using it as an argument against lost civilizations. I refer to his theory that Muslim cultures were in direct contact with the Americas before Columbus, only one of many unsupported propositions of Pre-Columbian exploration of the New World.

Tags
archaeology

More like this

Where did syphilis come from?
Some infectious agents, it seems, have been with us since the rise of humanity. Bacteria like E. coli or salmonella don't appear to have one moment enshrined in history where they first appeared on the scene. They've probably long been with us, causing disease sporadically but not spectacularly…
1491 by Charles C. Mann
We picked up a used copy of Charles Mann's pop-archeology book 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus a while back. I didn't read it at the time, because I was a little afraid that it would be rather polemical in what I think of as the Neil Young mode-- wildly overstating the…
Sociologist Disappointed With Skeptics
In the current issue of Antiquity is a review of G.G. Fagan's edited volume Archaeological Fantasies (available on-line behind a paywall). I reviewed this book favourably back in September: it's pretty much a skeptical attack on pseudo-scientific archaeology. Antiquity's reviewer, however, doesn't…
First Greenlanders left no descendents?
Here's another example of how genetic methods can shed light on archaeological questions, Paleo-Eskimo mtDNA Genome Reveals Matrilineal Discontinuity in Greenland: The Paleo-Eskimo Saqqaq and Independence I cultures, documented from archaeological remains in Northern Canada and Greenland, represent…

How disappointing. From the headline, I thought this was about some new sport.

What's really interesting about skeptic's general rejection of pre columbian contact is the emphasis placed on refuting the obviously faked or shaky evidence (ancient astronauts, most of Fell's work on epigraphy, the Bat Creek Stone, etc.)that has been presented in the past, while ignoring the hard evidence that does exist [plant genetics, animal genetics, the Petersborough Proto-Tifnagh inscriptions, Jomon pottery in Central America, maize in Asia, etc)..

The situation reminds me of the Clovis Police of 30 years ago who bent over backward to refute evidence of human inhabitants in North America before 12000 CE just to protect their reputations. Ignoring evidence because it does not fit one's training or paradigm is not science.